Different behavior has been observed for the psi torsion angle of the glycosidic linkages of D-GalNAc-Ser and D-GalNAc-Thr motifs, allowing the carbohydrate moiety to adopt a completely different orientation. In addition, the fact that the water pockets found in alpha-D-GalNAc-Thr differ from those obtained for its serine analogue could be related to the different capability that the two model glycopeptides have to structure the surrounding water. This fact could have important biological inferences (i.e., antifreeze activity).

The structural features of MUC1-like glycopeptides bearing the Tn antigen (α-O-GalNAc-Ser/Thr) in complex with an anti MUC-1 antibody are reported at atomic resolution. For the α-O-GalNAc-Ser derivative, the glycosidic linkage adopts a high-energy conformation, barely populated in the free state. This unusual structure (also observed in an α-S-GalNAc-Cys mimic) is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between the peptidic fragment and the sugar. The selection of a particular peptide structure by the antibody is thus propagated to the carbohydrate through carbohydrate/peptide contacts, which force a change in the orientation of the sugar moiety. This seems to be unfeasible in the α-O-GalNAc-Thr glycopeptide owing to the more limited flexibility of the side chain imposed by the methyl group. Our data demonstrate the non-equivalence of Ser and Thr O-glycosylation points in molecular recognition processes. These features provide insight into the occurrence in nature of the APDTRP epitope for anti-MUC1 antibodies.

The structural features of the mucin-type simplest model, namely, the glycopeptide alpha-O-GalNAc-l-Ser diamide, have been investigated by combining NMR spectroscopy, molecular dynamics simulations, and DFT calculations. In contrast to previous reports, the study reveals that intramolecular hydrogen bonds between sugar and peptide residues are very weak and, as a consequence, not strong enough to maintain the well-defined conformation of this type of molecule. In fact, the observed conformation of this model glycopeptide can be satisfactorily explained by the presence of water pockets/bridges between the sugar and the peptide moieties. Additionally, DFT calculations reveal that not only the bridging water molecules but also the surrounding water molecules in the first hydration shell are essential to keep the existing conformation.