This two‐part article gives an overview of the developments of the structural member verification in prEN 1993‐1‐1:2020 ”Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – part 1‐1: General rules and rules for buildings“, one of the second generation of Eurocodes. These developments were undertaken by Working Group 1 (WG1) of Subcommittee CEN/TC250/SC3 and by Project Team 1 (SC3.PT1) responsible for drafting the new version of EN 1993‐1‐1. In the past, WG1 collected many topics needing improvement, and the systematic review conducted every five years also yielded topics needing further development. Based on this, the current version of EN 1993‐1‐1 has been developed into a new draft version prEN 1993‐1‐1:2020 enhancing ”ease of use“. The technical content of this new draft was laid down at the end of 2019. Many improvements to design rules have been established with respect to structural analysis, resistance of cross‐sections and stability of members. This two‐part article focuses on member stability design rules and deals with the basis for the calibration of partial factors, the introduction of more economic design rules for semi‐compact sections, methods for structural analysis in relation to the appropriate member stability design rules, new design rules for lateral torsional buckling plus other developments and innovations. This second part of the article is dedicated to illustrating the most relevant changes to member buckling design rules.

No abstract

The residual stress distribution influences substantially the stability behavior of steel members. Its shape, directly impacted by the fabrication process, is very different in hot‐rolled and welded members. Among welded members, flame‐cut flanges and hot‐rolled flanges are commonly employed in practice. However, buckling curves of Eurocode 3 are based on experimental tests and numerical simulations performed on welded members having hot‐rolled flanges only and lead to conservative results comparatively to the previous French design standards but also to hot‐rolled members. Investigations are strongly needed to adapt the existing buckling curves to welded members using flame‐cut flanges and a first step is to estimate the residual stress distribution in such members. The results available in the literature dealing with residual stresses measurements in welded members with flame‐cut flanges investigate stocky profiles that can be far from common practice, welded members being preferably slender sections. This paper presents the results of an experimental campaign on residual stresses performed on eight slender welded members varying the flange width and thickness as well as the flange type : hot‐rolled or flame‐cut. The measurements were performed using the sectioning method. A new model for residual stress distribution in welded I‐section members with flame‐cut flanges is then proposed based on these tests results and existing data from the literature.

No abstract

No abstract