BackgroundTo evaluate the antibiotic resistance patterns of uropathogens isolated from adult women with acute community-acquired (CA) uncomplicated cystitis.ResultsOver a one-year period (May 2015–April 2016), the results of susceptibility testing of outpatient midstream urine samples from 5 different laboratories were prospectively evaluated. The study included only adult women with uncomplicated cystitis. The susceptibility testing in all laboratories was performed using the disk diffusion method with the VITEK-2 Compact system. The isolated uropathogens and their resistance to the tested antibiotics were evaluated. Out of 317 adult women with CA uncomplicated cystitis, 179 had a positive culture. The most commonly isolated organism was Escherichia coli (E. coli) (70.4%), followed by Klebsiella (21.2%). The overall resistance rate was highest for ampicillin (85.6%), followed by cefalotin (56.3%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (54.7%), pipracillin (51.9%), nitrofurantoin (48.8%) and aztreonam (47.4%). Isolated E. coli strains were commonly resistant to ampicillin (80.5%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (72.2%) and aztreonam (71.4%), followed by cefalotin (55.9%). The overall ciprofloxacin resistance rate was 17.9%, and the resistent was found only with E. coli (25.4%).ConclusionsOur results may aid in the selection of proper empiric antibiotic therapy for adult women with acute CA uncomplicated cystitis.

Introduction: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has recently started to be viewed as a promising technology that could be an alternative to different treatment options of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), especially in high-risk patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAE in BPH patients who are at high risk for surgery and/or anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Between June 2013 and February 2015, BPH patients >50 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) refractory to BPH-related medical therapy or had an indwelling urethral catheter due to refractory urine retention were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients were at high risk for surgery and/or anesthesia. The PAE was performed and the embolising material used was biosphere 300-500 µm particles. Pre- and 1, 3, 9 months post-intervention, all patients were assessed by detailed medical history, physical examination, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), uroflowmetry, and abdominal and transrectal ultrasonography. Results: Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 72.50 years and a mean prostate volume of 77.30 ± 14.89 cm³ were included. The PAE procedure was successful in all patients. Throughout the period of follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the LUTS and urinary flow rate, and reduction in prostate volume and serum PSA (for all p < 0.001). No major complications were reported. Conclusion: Our results show that BPH patients with failed medical treatment who are at high risk for surgery and/or anesthesia could be treated safely and effectively through PAE.

No abstract

No abstract