Breast cancer at a relatively young age with a poor prognosis is currently exhibiting an increasing incidence. In a retrospective cohort analysis of early breast cancer cases after surgery from our institutional patient registry, 141 patients aged ≤ 40 years constituted the younger group, with 300 randomly selected patients aged >40 years as controls. A significant and steady increase was found in the relative number of younger cases during the years 2004-2009. The histological type and grade and the lymph node status of the cancers differed significantly between the two groups, with more aggressive biological behaviour, a more advanced stage and a worse prognosis in the younger group. Half of the cancers in the younger cohort were ER-negative, while two-thirds in the control group were ER-positive. Comparatively more tumours were PR-positive and HER2-negative in the control group than in the younger group. The rates of triple-negative cases were 25% and 13% in the younger age and the control group, respectively (p = 0.026). Significantly higher mastectomy and axillary block dissection rates were observed in the younger age group, and more chemotherapy was administered than in the control group. Our findings demonstrate the significance of breast cancer in cases aged <40 years, and draw attention to the need for appropriate care in these cases.

Our retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical value of dose intensification schemes: WBRT and consecutive, delayed, or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in brain metastasis (BM) management. Clinical data and overall survival (OS) of 468 patients with BM from various primaries treated with 10 × 3 Gy WBRT (n = 195), WBRT+ 10 × 2 Gy boost (n = 125), or simultaneously 15 × 2.2 Gy WBRT+0.7 Gy boost (n = 148) during a 6-year period were statistically analysed. Significant difference in OS could be detected with additional boost to WBRT (3.3 versus 6.5 months) and this difference was confirmed for BMs of lung cancer and melanoma and both for oligo- and multiplex lesions. The OS was prolonged for the RPA 2 and RPA3 categories, if patients received escalated dose, 4.0 vs. 7.7 months; (p = 0.002) in class RPA2 and 2.6 vs. 4.2 months; (p < 0.0001) in the class RPA 3 respectively. The significant difference in OS was also achieved with SIB. The shortened overall treatment time of SIB with lower WBRT fraction dose exhibited survival benefit over WBRT alone, and could be applied for patients developing BM even with unfavourable prognostic factors. These results warrant for further study of this approach with dose escalation using the lately available solutions for hippocampus sparing and fractionated stereotactic irradiation. The simultaneous delivery of WBRT with reduced fraction dose and boost proved to be advantageous prolonging the OS with shortened treatment time and reduced probability for cognitive decline development even for patients with poor performance status and progressing extracranial disease.

Fulvestrant is a pure estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist approved for the treatment of metastatic ER positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. The clinical results of fulvestrant demonstrated encouraging activity in tumors in spite of HER2 positivity, but data about its use after progression on anti-HER2 agents are limited. Partial responses and durations of response of 12, 25, and 38 months in three cases with multiple metastases of ER positive and HER2 positive breast cancer were observed; all patients had been treated with 1–4 regimens of an anti-HER2 agent in combination with chemotherapy or an aromatase inhibitor before the initiation of fulvestrant. Fulvestrant is a valuable option with limited toxicity and durable response in metastatic HER2 and ER positive breast cancer after progression on anti-HER2 agents as well. Therapeutic benefit even in extensive skin metastases and (irradiated) brain metastases may be expected. Further investigations are warranted to establish where it fits into the multimodal management of ER and HER positive breast cancer.

No abstract

Background/Aim: To study the changes of glioblastoma multiforme during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to evaluate the impact of changes on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: Forty-three patients underwent volumetric imaging-based replanning. Prognostic factors and gross tumor volume changes in relation to overall survival and the effect of adaptive replanning were statistically analyzed. Results: Patients with total tumor removal, with shorter time to CRT (<27 days), with methylated O-6 methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and good performance status (>60%) had better survival. Tumor shrinkage in 24 patients resulted in improved survival compared to 19 in whom tumor was unchanged or progressed (25.3 vs. 11.1 months, p=0.04). Adapted planning target volume allowed a reduction in irradiated volume, while increasing survival (12.06 vs. 28.98 months, p=0.026). Conclusion: Tumor response during CRT has significant impact on the outcome. Adaptation of the planning target volume to the tumor changes proved to be beneficial and warrants further investigation.