No abstract

The effectiveness of the cough reflex in patients who aspirated following radiation for head and neck cancer was evaluated in 89 patients (49 chemoradiation, 33 postoperative radiation, and 7 radiation alone). All patients had modified barium swallow because of dysphagia. The cough reflex was graded as present and effective, ineffective, intermittently effective, or absent. All patients were cancer-free at the time of the swallowing study. The cough reflex was present and effective in 46 patients (52%), ineffective in 17 patients (19%), and absent in 26 patients (29%) on initial investigation. Among the 43 patients who had ineffective or absent cough reflex, their treatment was chemoradiation (26), postoperative radiation (13), and radiation alone (4). In 30 patients who had sequential modified barium swallow, the cough reflex was constantly effective, ineffective, or intermittently effective in 12 (40%), 13 (43%), and 5 (17%) patients, respectively. The cough reflex was frequently ineffective or absent in patients who aspirated following radiation for head and neck cancer. Cough may also be intermittently ineffective to protect the airways following radiation.

Background: To evaluate the impact of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation on patients’ quality of life (QOL) in a single institution. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 101 patients who had treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer in a single institution. Forty-seven patients had chemotherapy and radiation, 54 patients underwent postoperative radiation. QOL was assessed with the University of Washington (UW), and the Hospital Anxiety (HA) and Depression (HD) questionnaires. All patients were free of disease at the survey time. Results: Mean and median UW scores were not different between the 2 groups: chemoradiation (65/67), postoperative radiation (62/63). Mean and median HA scores were 7.6/7 (chemoradiation), and 8.3/8 (postoperative radiation). Mean and median HD scores were 6.7/7 (chemoradiation), and 7.1/7 (postoperative radiation). Forty-four patients developed complications, with mean/median UW, HA, and HD scores of 55/55, 9.9/8, and 8.9/9, respectively. These scores were significantly different compared to the 57 patients without complications: 70/70 (p = 0.0001), 6.5/6 (p = 0.001), and 8.9/9 (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in QOL between chemoradiation and postoperative radiation in this retrospective study with a relatively short follow-up in the chemoradiation group. In addition, there were more patients with resectable disease in the postoperative group which may explain the lack of difference in QOL between the two groups. Patients who developed complications following treatment experienced lower QOL, more anxiety and depression. Our study raised the need to conduct a prospective randomized study to assess the real impact of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation on patients’ QOL.

No abstract