We document the development of a suite of carbonate mineral reference materials for calibrating SIMS determinations of δ18O in samples with compositions along the dolomite–ankerite solid solution series [CaMg(CO3)2–CaFe(CO3)2]. Under routine operating conditions for the analysis of carbonates for δ18O with a CAMECA IMS 1280 instrument (at WiscSIMS, University of Wisconsin‐Madison), the magnitude of instrumental bias along the dolomite–ankerite series decreased exponentially by ~ 10‰ with increasing Fe content in the dolomite structure, but appeared insensitive to minor Mn substitution [< 2.6 mol% Mn/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Mn)]. The compositional dependence of bias (i.e., the sample matrix effect) was calibrated using the Hill equation, which relates bias to the Fe# of dolomite–ankerite [i.e., molar Fe/(Mg+Fe)] for thirteen reference materials (Fe# = 0.004–0.789); for calibrations employing either 10 or 3 μm diameter spot size measurements, this yielded residual values ≤ 0.3–0.4‰ relative to CRM NBS 19 for most reference materials in the suite. Analytical precision was ± 0.3‰ (2s, standard deviations) for 10‐μm spots and ± 0.7‰ (2s) for 3‐μm spots, based on the spot‐to‐spot repeatability of a drift monitor material that ‘bracketed’ each set of ten sample‐spot analyses. Analytical uncertainty for individual sample analyses was approximated by a combination of precision and calibration residual values (propagated in quadrature), suggesting an uncertainty of ± 0.5‰ (2s) for 10‐μm spots and ± 1‰ (2s) for 3‐μm spots.

This study is Part II of a series that documents the development of a suite of calibration reference materials for in situ SIMS analysis of stable isotope ratios in Ca‐Mg‐Fe carbonates. Part I explored the effects of Fe2+ substitution on SIMS δ18O bias measured from the dolomite–ankerite solid solution series [CaMg(CO3)2–CaFe(CO3)2], whereas this complementary work explores the compositional dependence of SIMS δ13C bias (calibrated range: Fe# = 0.004–0.789, where Fe# = molar Fe/(Mg+Fe)). Under routine operating conditions for carbonate δ13C analysis at WiscSIMS (CAMECA IMS 1280), the magnitude of instrumental bias increased exponentially by 2.5–5.5‰ (session‐specific) with increasing Fe‐content in the dolomite structure, but appeared insensitive to minor Mn substitution [< 2.6 mole % Mn/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Mn)]. The compositional dependence of bias (i.e., the matrix effect) was expressed using the Hill equation, yielding calibration residual values ≤ 0.3‰ relative to CRM NBS‐19 for eleven carbonate reference materials (6‐μm‐diameter spot size measurements). Based on the spot‐to‐spot repeatability of a drift monitor material that ‘bracketed’ each set of ten sample‐spot analyses, the analytical precision was ± 0.6–1.2‰ (2s, standard deviations). The analytical uncertainty for individual sample analyses was approximated by combining the precision and calibration residual values (propagated in quadrature), suggesting an uncertainty of ± 1.0–1.5‰ (2s).

The Neoproterozoic sulfur isotope (δ 34 S) record is characterized by anomalously high δ 34 S pyrite values. Many δ 34 S pyrite values are higher than the contemporaneous δ 34 S sulfate (i.e., δ 34 S pyrite > δ 34 S sulfate ), showing reversed fractionation. This phenomenon has been reported from the Neoproterozoic post-glacial strata globally and is called "Neoproterozoic superheavy pyrite." The commonly assumed biogenic genesis of superheavy pyrite conflicts with current understanding of the marine sulfur cycle. Various models have been proposed to interpret this phenomenon, including extremely low concentrations of sulfate in seawaters or pore waters, or the existence of a geographically isolated and geochemically stratified ocean. Implicit and fundamental in all these published models is the assumption of a biogenic origin for pyrite genesis, which hypothesizes that the superheavy pyrite is syngenetic (in the water column) or early diagenetic (in shallow marine sediments) in origin and formed via microbial sulfate reduction (MSR). In this study, the Cryogenian Datangpo Formation in South China, which preserves some of the highest δ 34 S pyrite values up to +70‰, is studied by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) at unprecedented spatial resolutions (2 μm). Based on textures and the new sulfur isotope results, we propose that the Datangpo superheavy pyrite formed via thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) in hydrothermal fluids during late burial diagenesis and, therefore, lacks a biogeochemical connection to the Neoproterozoic sulfur cycle. Our study demonstrates that SEM-SIMS is an effective approach to assess the genesis of sedimentary pyrite using combined SEM petrography and micrometer-scale δ 34 S measurements by SIMS. The possibility that pervasive TSR has overprinted the primary δ 34 S pyrite signals during late diagenesis in other localities may necessitate the reappraisal of some of the δ 34 S pyrite profiles associated with superheavy pyrite throughout Earth's history.

No abstract