A supervised, moderate- to high-intensity, combined resistance and aerobic exercise program is most effective for patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. A home-based, low-intensity physical activity program represents a viable alternative for women who are unable or unwilling to follow the higher intensity program.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

PURPOSE Tamoxifen is widely prescribed as adjuvant therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. It has been postulated that concentrations of endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen, are a better predictor of tamoxifen efficacy than CYP2D6 genotypes. Although in a retrospective study, an endoxifen threshold of 5.9 ng/mL for efficacy was described, confirmation based on prospective studies is lacking. The objective of the prospective CYPTAM (The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR1509) study was to associate endoxifen concentrations and CYP2D6 genotypes with clinical outcome in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS From February 2008 to December 2010, patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen were included. Patients could be enrolled up to a maximum of 12 months after tamoxifen initiation. Blood samples were retrieved for CYP2D6 genotyping and endoxifen measurements by Amplichip (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. Endoxifen concentrations were analyzed as a continuous variable, classifying patients into quartiles and using an endoxifen threshold of 5.9 ng/mL. Endoxifen concentrations and CYP2D6 genotypes were associated with relapse-free survival (censored at the time of tamoxifen discontinuation; RFSt) by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 667 pre- and postmenopausal patients were enrolled and had received tamoxifen for a median time of 0.37 years (range, 0.23 to 0.6 years) before study entry. No association was found between endoxifen concentrations and RFSt (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.991; 95% CI, 0.946 to 1.038; P = .691). Also, neither categorizing endoxifen concentrations into quartiles nor using 5.9 ng/mL as threshold altered these results. In addition, no association was found between CYP2D6 genotype and RFSt (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.929; 95% CI, 0.525 to 1.642; P = .799). CONCLUSION This prospective clinical study shows no association between endoxifen concentrations or CYP2D6 genotypes and clinical outcome in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.

BackgroundIn patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed.ResultsIn the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 patients had undergone a primary tumor resection and 141 and 159 patients had not, respectively. In the CAIRO study, a significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival was observed for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 16.7 vs. 11.4 months [P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61], and 6.7 vs. 5.9 months (P = 0.004; HR 0.74), respectively. In the CAIRO2 study, median overall survival and progression-free survival were also significantly better for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 20.7 vs. 13.4 months (P < 0.0001; HR 0.65) and 10.5 vs. 7.8 months (P = 0.014; HR 0.78), respectively. These differences remained significant in multivariate analyses. Our review identified 22 nonrandomized studies, most of which showed improved survival for mCRC patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor.ConclusionsOur results as well as data from literature indicate that resection of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor for survival in stage IV CRC patients. The potential bias of these results warrants prospective studies on the value of resection of primary tumor in this setting; such studies are currently being planned.

Background. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed. Results. In the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 patients had undergone a primary tumor resection and 141 and 159 patients had not, respectively. In the CAIRO study, a significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival was observed for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 16.7 vs. 11.4 months [P \ 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61], and 6.7 vs. 5.9 months (P = 0.004; HR 0.74), respectively. In the CAIRO2 study, median overall survival and progressionfree survival were also significantly better for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 20.7 vs. 13.4 months (P \ 0.0001; HR 0.65) and 10.5 vs. 7.8 months (P = 0.014; HR 0.78), respectively. These differences remained significant in multivariate analyses. Our review identified 22 nonrandomized studies, most of which showed improved survival for mCRC patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor. Conclusions. Our results as well as data from literature indicate that resection of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor for survival in stage IV CRC patients. The potential bias of these results warrants prospective studies on the value of resection of primary tumor in this setting; such studies are currently being planned.

To improve the prognosis of limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) the addition of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy to a platinum-containing regimen is important. In the Netherlands, we initiated a multicenter, phase II study, of the combination of four cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5), paclitaxel (200 mg m À2) and etoposide (2 Â 50 mg orally for 5 days) combined with 45 Gy (daily fractions of 1.8 Gy). The radiation was given to the involved field and concurrently with the second and third chemotherapy cycle. Patients with a partial or complete response received prophylactic cranial irradiation to a dose of 30 Gy. From January 1999 to December 2001, 37 of the 38 patients with LS-SCLC entered were eligible for toxicity analysis and response. Grade 3 and 4 haematological toxicity occurred in 57% (21/37) with febrile neutropenia in 24% (9/37). There were no treatment-related deaths or other grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities were oesophagitis (27%), radiation pneumonitis (6%), anorexia (14%), nausea (16%), dyspnea (19%) and lethargy (22%). The objective response rate was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 80 -98%) with a median survival time of 19.5 months (95% CI 12.8 -29.2). The 1-, 2-and 5-year survival rate was 70, 47 and 27%, respectively. In field local recurrences occurred in six patients. Distant metastases were observed in 19 patients of which 13 in the brain. This study indicates that combination chemotherapy with concurrent involved-field radiation therapy is an effective treatment for LS-SCLC. Despite PCI, the brain remained the most important site of recurrence.