Most human tumours have genetic mutations in their Rb and p53 pathways, but retinoblastoma is thought to be an exception. Studies suggest that retinoblastomas, which initiate with mutations in the gene retinoblastoma 1 (RB1), bypass the p53 pathway because they arise from intrinsically death-resistant cells during retinal development. In contrast to this prevailing theory, here we show that the tumour surveillance pathway mediated by Arf, MDM2, MDMX and p53 is activated after loss of RB1 during retinogenesis. RB1-deficient retinoblasts undergo p53-mediated apoptosis and exit the cell cycle. Subsequently, amplification of the MDMX gene and increased expression of MDMX protein are strongly selected for during tumour progression as a mechanism to suppress the p53 response in RB1-deficient retinal cells. Our data provide evidence that the p53 pathway is inactivated in retinoblastoma and that this cancer does not originate from intrinsically death-resistant cells as previously thought. In addition, they support the idea that MDMX is a specific chemotherapeutic target for treating retinoblastoma.
Here we report the isolation of a cDNA encoding a new p53‐associating protein. This new protein has been called MDMX on the basis of its structural similarity to MDM2, which is especially notable in the p53‐binding domain. In addition, the putative metal binding domains in the C‐terminal part of MDM2 are completely conserved in MDMX. The middle part of the MDMX and MDM2 proteins shows a low degree of conservation. We can show by co‐immunoprecipitation that the MDMX protein interacts specifically with p53 in vivo. This interaction probably occurs with the N‐terminal part of p53, because the activity of the transcription activation domain of p53 was inhibited by co‐transfection of MDMX. Northern blotting showed that MDMX, like MDM2, is expressed in all tissues tested, and that several mRNAs for MDMX can be detected. Interestingly, the level of MDMX mRNA is unchanged after UV irradiation, in contrast to MDM2 transcription. This observation suggests that MDMX may be a differently regulated modifier of p53 activity in comparison with MDM2. Our study indicates that at least one additional member of the MDM protein family exists which can modulate p53 function.
The p53 protein can inhibit cell cycling or induce apoptosis, and is thus a critical regulator of tumorigenesis. This protein is negatively regulated by a physical interaction with MDM2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. This interaction is critical for cell viability; loss of Mdm2 causes cell death in vitro and in vivo in a p53-dependent manner. The recently discovered MDM2-related protein MDM4 (also known as MDMX) has some of the same properties as MDM2. MDM4 binds and inhibits p53 transcriptional activity in vitro. Unlike MDM2, however, MDM4 does not cause nuclear export or degradation of p53 (refs. 9,10). To study MDM4 function in vivo, we deleted Mdm4 in mice. Mdm4-null mice died at 7.5-8.5 dpc, owing to loss of cell proliferation and not induction of apoptosis. To assess the importance of p53 in the death of Mdm4-/- embryos, we crossed in the Trp53-null allele. The loss of Trp53 completely rescued the Mdm4-/- embryonic lethality. Thus, MDM2 and MDM4 are nonoverlapping critical regulators of p53 in vivo. These data define a new pathway of p53 regulation and raise the possibility that increased MDM4 levels and the resulting inactivation of p53 contribute to the development of human tumors.
Human tumors are believed to harbor a disabled p53 tumor suppressor pathway, either through direct mutation of the p53 gene or through aberrant expression of proteins acting in the p53 pathway, such as p14 ARF or Mdm2. A role for Mdmx (or Mdm4) as a key negative regulator of p53 function in vivo has been established. However, a direct contribution of Mdmx to tumor formation remains to be demonstrated. Here we show that retrovirus-mediated Mdmx overexpression allows primary mouse embryonic fibroblast immortalization and leads to neoplastic transformation in combination with HRas V12 . Furthermore, the human Mdmx ortholog, Hdmx, was found to be overexpressed in a significant percentage of various human tumors and amplified in 5% of primary breast tumors, all of which retained wild-type p53. Hdmx was also amplified and highly expressed in MCF-7, a breast cancer cell line harboring wild-type p53, and interfering RNA-mediated reduction of Hdmx markedly inhibited the growth potential of these cells in a p53-dependent manner. Together, these results make Hdmx a new putative drug target for cancer therapy.
The inactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway, which often occurs through mutations in TP53 (encoding tumor protein 53) is a common step in human cancer. However, in melanoma—a highly chemotherapy-resistant disease—TP53 mutations are rare, raising the possibility that this cancer uses alternative ways to overcome p53-mediated tumor suppression. Here we show that Mdm4 p53 binding protein homolog (MDM4), a negative regulator of p53, is upregulated in a substantial proportion (∼65%) of stage I–IV human melanomas and that melanocyte-specific Mdm4 overexpression enhanced tumorigenesis in a mouse model of melanoma induced by the oncogene Nras. MDM4 promotes the survival of human metastatic melanoma by antagonizing p53 proapoptotic function. Notably, inhibition of the MDM4-p53 interaction restored p53 function in melanoma cells, resulting in increased sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy and to inhibitors of the BRAF (V600E) oncogene. Our results identify MDM4 as a key determinant of impaired p53 function in human melanoma and designate MDM4 as a promising target for antimelanoma combination therapy.
We report here the characterization of a mutant mouse line with a specific gene trap event in the Mdm4 locus. Absence of Mdm4 expression results in embryonic lethality (10.5 days postcoitum [dpc]), which was rescued by transferring the Mdm4 mutation into a Trp53-null background. Mutant embryos were characterized by overall growth deficiency, anemia, improper neural tube closure, and dilation of lateral ventricles. In situ analysis demonstrated increased levels of p21 CIP1/Waf1 and lower levels of Cyclin E and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression. Consistent with lack of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine incorporation, these data suggest a block of mutant embryo cells in the G 1 phase of the cell cycle. Accordingly, Mdm4-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts manifested a greatly reduced proliferative capacity in culture. Moreover, extensive p53-dependent cell death was specifically detected in the developing central nervous system of the Mdm4 mutant embryos. These findings unambiguously assign a critical role for Mdm4 as a negative regulator of p53 and suggest that Mdm4 could contribute to neoplasias retaining wild-type Trp53. Finally, we provide evidence indicating that Mdm4 plays no role on cell proliferation or cell cycle control that is distinct from its ability to modulate p53 function.
MDMX, an MDM2-related protein, has emerged as yet another essential negative regulator of p53 tumor suppressor, since loss of MDMX expression results in p53-dependent embryonic lethality in mice. However, it remains unknown why neither homologue can compensate for the loss of the other. In addition, results of biochemical studies have suggested that MDMX inhibits MDM2-mediated p53 degradation, thus contradicting its role as defined in gene knockout experiments. Using cells deficient in either MDM2 or MDMX, we demonstrated that these two p53 inhibitors are in fact functionally dependent on each other. In the absence of MDMX, MDM2 is largely ineffective in down-regulating p53 because of its extremely short half-life. MDMX renders MDM2 protein sufficiently stable to function at its full potential for p53 degradation. On the other hand, MDMX, which is a cytoplasmic protein, depends on MDM2 to redistribute into the nucleus and be able to inactivate p53. We also showed that MDMX, when exceedingly overexpressed, inhibits MDM2-mediated p53 degradation by competing with MDM2 for p53 binding. Our findings therefore provide a molecular basis for the nonoverlapping activities of these two p53 inhibitors previously revealed in genetic studies.The tumor suppressor gene p53 encodes a transcription factor that is activated in response to various forms of stress, leading to the induction of a number of genes whose products mediate either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis (1). Under most physiological conditions, p53 activity is tightly controlled, primarily through the ability of MDM2 to target p53 for degradation, which ensures cell survival. Current model of p53 activation suggests that diverse stress signals converge on a single regulatory node, namely the p53-MDM2 module, and interfere with the ability of MDM2 to target p53 for degradation (2). Analogous to MDM2, MDMX ablation is also associated with p53-dependent embryonic death in mice, placing MDMX in the category of essential p53 negative regulators (3). In contrast to MDM2, however, MDMX lacks ubiquitin E3 ligase activity and is unable to target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent proteolysis (4). Moreover, MDMX was reported to inhibit MDM2-mediated p53 degradation (4 -6), contradicting the role of MDMX as defined by the genetic study. To resolve these conflicting results and gain better understanding of why neither gene product can compensate for the loss of the other, we generated MDMX-deficient cells using small interference RNA (siRNA) 1 and carried out biochemical analysis of MDM2 in these cells. In conjunction with the use of MEFs derived from either single or double knock-out mice, our loss-of-function approach allowed us to obtain compelling evidence at the molecular level to highlight mutual dependence of MDM2 and MDMX in their functional inhibition of p53 and provide support for the findings obtained in genetic studies. /MDM2Ϫ/Ϫ MEFs (Dr. Carl Maki, Harvard School of Public Health), were maintained in minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovin...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.