LOFAR, the LOw-Frequency ARray, is a new-generation radio interferometer constructed in the north of the Netherlands and across europe. Utilizing a novel phased-array design, LOFAR covers the largely unexplored low-frequency range from 10-240 MHz and provides a number of unique observing capabilities. Spreading out from a core located near the village of Exloo in the northeast of the Netherlands, a total of 40 LOFAR stations are nearing completion. A further five stations have been deployed throughout Germany, and one station has been built in each of France, Sweden, and the UK. Digital beam-forming techniques make the LOFAR system agile and allow for rapid repointing of the telescope as well as the potential for multiple simultaneous observations. With its dense core array and long interferometric baselines, LOFAR achieves unparalleled sensitivity and angular resolution in the low-frequency radio regime. The LOFAR facilities are jointly operated by the International LOFAR Telescope (ILT) foundation, as an observatory open to the global astronomical community. LOFAR is one of the first radio observatories to feature automated processing pipelines to deliver fully calibrated science products to its user community. LOFAR's new capabilities, techniques and modus operandi make it an important pathfinder for the Square Kilometre Array (SKA). We give an overview of the LOFAR instrument, its major hardware and software components, and the core science objectives that have driven its design. In addition, we present a selection of new results from the commissioning phase of this new radio observatory.

The lightning flashes used in this work were mapped using data from the LO-FAR (LOw Frequency ARray) radio telescope. Due to its effective lightning protection system, LOFAR is able to continue to operate during thunderstorm activity[1]. The Dutch LOFAR stations consist of 38 (24 core + 14 remote) stations spread over 3200 km 2 in the northern Netherlands. The largest baseline between core stations is about 3 km, the largest baseline between remote stations is about 100 km. From each station we use 6 dual-polarized low band dipole antennas (LBA), sampled at 200 MHz, to observe the 30-80 MHz band. The raw time series data were saved to the transient buffer boards, which continuously buffer the last 5 s of data from a maximum of 48 dual-polarized antennas per station. The resulting relative timing accuracy is better than 1 ns. See [2] for more details on LOFAR. When a lightning flash occurs within the area enclosed by the Dutch LOFAR stations, as observed by www.lightningmaps.org, the transient buffer boards are stopped and the data is read to disk. The method we used to map each lightning flash has three major steps. In the first step we fitted plane-waves to the time of pulses received by individual LOFAR stations. Note that the LOFAR stations are less than 100 m in diameter and the lighting is many kilometers from the closest LOFAR station, so that a plane-wave approximation is very good for individual LOFAR stations. These plane-waves were used to identify non-functional antennas, and the intersection of their arrival directions gave a rough first estimate of the flash location, accurate to a few kilometers. Since each station has its own clock and cable delays, in the second step we found the clock offsets between the different LOFAR stations by simultaneously fitting the locations of multiple events and station clock offsets to the measured times of radio pulses, with a Levenberg-Marquardt minimizer. In order to achieve the highest precision, we chose to fit locations of 5 events that created pulses that were strong but not saturating, had a simple structure, and did not change shape significantly across different stations. After fitting, the root-mean-square difference between the modeled and measured arrival times of the radio pulses was around 1 ns. The resulting station clock offsets are consistent with LOFAR station clock calibrations, which are known

Aims. This paper discusses the spectral occupancy for performing radio astronomy with the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR), with a focus on imaging observations. Methods. We have analysed the radio-frequency interference (RFI) situation in two 24-h surveys with Dutch LOFAR stations, covering 30−78 MHz with low-band antennas and 115-163 MHz with high-band antennas. This is a subset of the full frequency range of LOFAR. The surveys have been observed with a 0.76 kHz/1 s resolution. Results. We measured the RFI occupancy in the low and high frequency sets to be 1.8% and 3.2% respectively. These values are found to be representative values for the LOFAR radio environment. Between day and night, there is no significant difference in the radio environment. We find that lowering the current observational time and frequency resolutions of LOFAR results in a slight loss of flagging accuracy. At LOFAR's nominal resolution of 0.76 kHz and 1 s, the false-positives rate is about 0.5%. This rate increases approximately linearly when decreasing the data frequency resolution. Conclusions. Currently, by using an automated RFI detection strategy, the LOFAR radio environment poses no perceivable problems for sensitive observing. It remains to be seen if this is still true for very deep observations that integrate over tens of nights, but the situation looks promising. Reasons for the low impact of RFI are the high spectral and time resolution of LOFAR; accurate detection methods; strong filters and high receiver linearity; and the proximity of the antennas to the ground. We discuss some strategies that can be used once low-level RFI starts to become apparent. It is important that the frequency range of LOFAR remains free of broadband interference, such as DAB stations and windmills.

This paper presents the results from one of the first observations of ionospheric scintillation taken using the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR). The observation was of the strong natural radio source Cassiopeia A, taken overnight on 18–19 August 2013, and exhibited moderately strong scattering effects in dynamic spectra of intensity received across an observing bandwidth of 10–80 MHz. Delay-Doppler spectra (the 2-D FFT of the dynamic spectrum) from the first hour of observation showed two discrete parabolic arcs, one with a steep curvature and the other shallow, which can be used to provide estimates of the distance to, and velocity of, the scattering plasma. A cross-correlation analysis of data received by the dense array of stations in the LOFAR “core” reveals two different velocities in the scintillation pattern: a primary velocity of ~20–40 ms−1 with a north-west to south-east direction, associated with the steep parabolic arc and a scattering altitude in the F-region or higher, and a secondary velocity of ~110 ms−1 with a north-east to south-west direction, associated with the shallow arc and a scattering altitude in the D-region. Geomagnetic activity was low in the mid-latitudes at the time, but a weak sub-storm at high latitudes reached its peak at the start of the observation. An analysis of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and ionosonde data from the time reveals a larger-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance (TID), possibly the result of the high-latitude activity, travelling in the north-west to south-east direction, and, simultaneously, a smaller-scale TID travelling in a north-east to south-west direction, which could be associated with atmospheric gravity wave activity. The LOFAR observation shows scattering from both TIDs, at different altitudes and propagating in different directions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that such a phenomenon has been reported.