Pronethalol was shown by Black & Stephenson (1962) to have many actions consistent with the view that its chief effect was blockade of sympathetic P-receptors. For example, in cats anaesthetized with chloralose, 2.5 mg/kg of pronethalol halved, and 5 mg/kg reduced by nine-tenths, submaximal accelerations of heart rate produced by injections of isoprenaline. However, in guinea-pigs anaesthetized with urethane (1.6 g/kg), it was found (Sekiya & Vaughan Williams, 1963a) that, although pronethalol (10 mg/kg) approximately halved the spontaneous heart rate, responses to isoprenaline were reduced to a lesser extent. Actions of pronethalol other than fl-receptor blockade also came to light, and it was shown (Gill & Vaughan Williams, 1964) that pronethalol was a local anaesthetic with nearly twice the potency of procaine.Further investigation (Sekiya & Vaughan Williams, 1963b, 1965 provided evidence that pronethalol had some central nervous action which merited further study, in particular the depression or abolition of the reflex withdrawal of a limb in response to electric shocks to the skin. The present paper represents an attempt to carry the analysis of this effect a stage further. It was possible that the depression of the reflex responses was related to the local anaesthetic action of pronethalol. On the other hand, an a priori case could be made for its being connected with blockade of P-receptors in the spinal cord, for Bfilbring & Burn (1941) had reported that, in dogs in which the spinal cord and a limb were perfused with separate circulations, adrenaline greatly potentiated the flexor reflex (contractions of tibialis anterior in response to stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve). It was thus conceivable that the depression of the flexor reflex by pronethalol might have involved the removal of a facilitatory influence in the spinal cord mediated by P-receptors, but before any such hypothesis could be entertained a number of other possible explanations for the depression needed investigation.
METHODSContractions of the quadriceps were recorded in response to a train of stimuli (0.9 msec duration, 150 shocks/sec) to the skin or to the ipsilateral sciatic nerve, which was crushed and tied peripherally. The limb was immobilized by transfixation of the femur. Tendon jerks were elicited from the other limb by a solenoid-operated hammer, and when both reflexes were recorded simultaneously ball-bearing myographs were employed (Vaughan Williams, 1964). For tests on neuromuscular conduction, contractions of the gastrocnemius muscle were recorded in response to stimuli to the sciatic nerve, which was crushed * British Council Scholar from the University of San Luis Potosi, Mexico.