SummaryBackground Drug patch tests (PTs) can reproduce delayed hypersensitivity to drugs and entail a moderate re-exposure of patients to offending drugs. Objectives To determine the value of PTs for identifying the responsible drug in severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) such as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome ⁄toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS ⁄TEN). Methods In a multicentre study, PTs were conducted on patients referred for DRESS, AGEP or SJS ⁄TEN within 1 year of their SCAR. All drugs administered in the 2 months prior to and the week following the onset of the SCAR were tested. Results Among the 134 patients included (48 male, 86 female; mean age 51AE7 years), positive drug PTs were obtained for 24 different drugs. These included positive tests for 64% (46 ⁄72) of patients with DRESS, 58% (26 ⁄45) of those with AGEP and 24% (4 ⁄17) of those with SJS ⁄TEN, with only one relapse of AGEP. The value of PTs depended on the type of drug and the type of SCAR (e.g. carbamazepine was positive in 11 ⁄13 DRESS cases but none of the five SJS ⁄TEN cases). PTs were frequently positive for beta lactams (22 cases), pristinamycin (11 cases) and in DRESS with pump proton inhibitors (five cases), but were usually negative for allopurinol and salazopyrin. Of 18 patients with DRESS, eight had virus reactivation and positive PTs. In DRESS, multiple drug reactivity was frequent (18% of cases), with patients remaining sensitized many years later. Conclusions PTs are useful and safe for identifying agents inducing SCAR.

Background: Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials. Objective:We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort.Methods: Patients were included between March 2017 and April 2018. Efficacy outcomes were collected both at baseline and three months (M3), when available, including SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) and EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) scores. Adverse events (AE) were recorded at the follow-up. Results:We included 241 patients. The median follow-up time was 3.8±3.7 months. SCORAD75 and EASI75 were achieved in 27/163 (16.6%) and 40/82 (48.8%) patients, respectively. The median SCORAD and EASI at M3 were significantly lower compared with baseline (25±21 vs 56±27.4, p<10 -9 and 4.1±6.8 vs 17.9±15.4, p<10 -9 , respectively).Conjunctivitis was reported in 84/241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion of eosinophilia (>500/mm 3 ) during follow-up (57%) was higher than at baseline (33.7%) (n=172, p<10 -6 ).Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases, 27 of which were due to an AE. Limitations:No control group, missing data. Conclusion:This real-life study demonstrated results similar to clinical trials, with regard to dupilumab effectiveness, but revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.

We report 10 cases of conjunctivitis in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab from November 2017 to November 2018 in our institution, who were referred to the ophthalmology department for diagnosis and management of conjunctivitis. We also describe ocular surface findings in these patients before the first injection of dupilumab. During the first 6 months post initiation of dupilumab, incidence of conjunctivitis was 27% (5/18) in patients treated from November 2017 to April 2018 who had not had ocular examination previously. This rate dropped to 12% (3/25) after systematic ophthalmological referral before initiation of dupilumab. Patients who developed conjunctivitis had mean SCORAD score (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) of 60.4 ± 20 (35–88) and mean EASI score (Eczema Area and Severity Index) of 37 ± 17 (14.6–56). Mean age was 36 years (20–51). Most patients had a long history of AD (> 10 years). Mean delay of ocular surface inflammation was 3.5 months, ranging from 1 to 8 months. One patient had to discontinue dupilumab because of severe follicular conjunctivitis. We observed two clinical patterns of ocular surface diseases: a mild non-specific conjunctivitis with dry eyes, which improved with warm compresses and artificial tears without any recurrence; and a severe dupilumab-induced follicular conjunctivitis without keratitis, which required specific ophthalmological management. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40123-019-0191-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

JEADV AbstractBackground Three biotherapiesetanercept, adalimumab and ustekinumabare licensed in childhood psoriasis. The few data available on their efficacy and tolerance are mainly derived from industry trials. However, biological drug survival impacts long-term performance in real-life settings.Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival rates of biological therapies in children with psoriasis in real-life conditions. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the factors associated with the choice of the biological therapy and to report severe adverse events. Materials and methodsThis study was an observational retrospective study. Data were extracted from the clinical records of 134 children. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to analyse drug survival overall and in subgroups of plaque psoriasis, bio-na€ ıve and non-na€ ıve patients. ResultsWe analysed 184 treatment courses: 70 with etanercept, 68 with adalimumab and 46 with ustekinumab.Factors associated with the choice of first-line biological agent were age at initiation (younger for adalimumab, P < 0.0001), age at onset of psoriasis (younger for adalimumab and etanercept, P = 0.03) and baseline Psoriasis Assessment Severity Index and Physician global assessment (both higher for adalimumab, P < 0.001). Drug survival rates were higher for ustekinumab than for adalimumab and etanercept (P < 0.0001) for all treatment and all psoriasis types, plaque-type psoriasis (P = 0.0003), patients na€ ıve for biological agents (P = 0.0007) and non-na€ ıve patients (P = 0.007). We reported eight serious adverse events (SAEs): severe infections (n = 3), significant weight gain (n = 2), psoriasis flare (n = 1) and malaise (n = 1). Biological therapy was discontinued in three children (one with psoriasis flare and two with weight gain). Only the two cases of weight gain resulted in an unfavourable outcome.Conclusions Our real-life comparative study found that ustekinumab had the best drug survival outcome. The profile of SAEs in children was comparable to that in adults. These results will assist dermatologists in the decision-making process when choosing treatment options for children with psoriasis in daily practice.