Summary. Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common adverse effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy. In contrast, only a few patients have been reported with HIT following low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) therapy (LMW‐HIT). To define the clinical and biological characteristics of LMW‐HIT, 180 patients treated for suspected HIT at 15 French centres were investigated. Clinical history was recorded and HIT was confirmed in 59 patients with positive serotonin release assay results: 57 of them had high levels of antibodies (Abs) to heparin–platelet factor 4 complexes (H/PF4) and two had Abs to interleukin 8. Eleven patients were treated exclusively with LMWH (LMW‐HIT) and 48 with UFH either alone (UF‐HIT, n = 34) or combined with LMWH (UF/LMW‐HIT, n = 14). The LMW‐HIT and UF‐HIT groups were similar with respect to sex, age, platelet count before heparin therapy, frequency of bleeding and occurrence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. The interval to onset of HIT was longer in LMW‐HIT patients compared with UF‐HIT patients (P = 0·03). Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 15 × 109/l) was more frequent in the LMW‐HIT group (P = 0·04). Thrombosis occurred in three of 11 LMW‐HIT patients, i.e. as frequently as in UF‐HIT patients. LMW‐HIT is potentially severe and may be observed after longer heparin treatment compared with UF‐HIT. It is highly recommended, therefore, that platelet counts be monitored carefully whenever LMWH is administered.
A randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of nadroparin 2850 IU (0.3 mL) vs. enoxaparin 4000 IU (40 mg) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after colorectal surgery for cancer Summary. Background: The optimal thromboprophylactic dosage regimen of low-molecular-weight heparins in high-risk general surgery remains debatable. Objectives: We performed a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of nadroparin 2850 IU (0.3 mL) and enoxaparin 4000 IU (40 mg) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after colorectal surgery for cancer. Patients and methods: Patients undergoing resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive once daily either 2850 IU nadroparin or 4000 IU enoxaparin s.c. for 9 ± 2 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected by bilateral venography or documented symptomatic DVT or pulmonary embolism up to day 12. The main safety outcome was major bleeding. A blinded independent committee adjudicated all outcomes. Results: Out of 1288 patients analyzed, efficacy was evaluable in 950 (73.8%) patients. The VTE rate was 15.9% (74/464) in nadroparintreated patients and 12.6% (61/486) in enoxaparin-treated patients, a relative risk of 1.27 (95% confidence interval; CI: 0.93-1.74) that did not met the criterion for non-inferiority of nadroparin. The rate of proximal DVT was comparable in the two groups (3.2% vs. 2.9%, respectively), but that of symptomatic VTE was lower in nadroparin-treated patients (0.2% vs. 1.4%). There was significantly (P ¼ 0.012) less major bleeding in nadroparin-than in enoxaparin-treated patients (7.3% vs. 11.5%, respectively). Conclusion: Compared with those receiving enoxaparin 4000 IU, patients treated with nadroparin 2850 IU showed a higher incidence of asymptomatic distal DVT, but a lower incidence of symptomatic VTE. Nadroparin treatment was safer in terms of bleeding risk.
SummaryThe incidence of factor VIII inhibitor was studied in a cohort of 56 previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII below 1 U/dl). They received only one brand of highly purified factor VIII concentrate (HPSD-VIII) prepared by conventional chromatography with a solvent-detergent step for viral inactivation. Followup since the first infusion of HPSD-VIII was from 1 to 76 months (mean = 29) and cumulative exposure days (CED) from 1 to over 100 (median = 26). Five patients (9%) developed an inhibitor after 6 to 19 CED, only one being a high responder (2%), showing a low incidence of inhibitor compared with previous studies using high purity plasma- derived or recombinant products.
We recently reported that after activation of human platelets by thrombin, glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX complexes are translocated to the surface-connected canalicular system (SCCS) (Blood 76:1503, 1990). As GPIb is a major receptor for von Willebrand factor (vWF) in platelet adhesion, we have now examined the consequences of thrombin activation on the organization of vWF bound to GPIb on the platelet surface. Studies were performed using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in either immunogold staining and electron microscopy (Au-EM) or in flow cytometry. When unstirred platelet-rich plasma was incubated with ristocetin, bound vWF was located by Au-EM as discrete masses regularly distributed over the cell surface. Platelets from a patient with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia, lacking GPIIb-IIIa complexes, gave a similar pattern, confirming that this represented binding to GPIb. That ristocetin was not precipitating vWF before their binding to the platelets was shown by the detection of similar masses on the surface of platelets of a patient with type IIB von Willebrand disease. Experiments were continued using washed normal platelets incubated in Tyrode-EDTA, the purpose of the EDTA being to limit the surface expression of endogenous vWF after platelet stimulation. Under these conditions, platelets were treated with ristocetin for 5 minutes at 37 degrees C in the presence of increasing amounts of purified vWF. This was followed by incubation with thrombin (0.5 U/mL) for periods of up to 10 minutes. Flow cytometry showed a time-dependent loss in the surface expression of vWF bound to GPIb and these changes were confirmed by Au-EM. In particular, immunogold staining performed on ultrathin sections showed that the bulk of the vWF was being cleared to internal membrane systems. Surface clearance of vWF during thrombin- induced platelet activation is a potential mechanism for regulating platelet adhesivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.