Levels of both serum and gastric juice tumor markers continue to have only limited diagnostic usefulness in gastric cancer patients. CEA and CA19.9 in the preoperative sera are good prognostic factors, whereas the presence of tumor markers in the gastric juice does not play any prognostic role.

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) shows a nychtohemeral fluctuation and an age-related trend. The aim of this study was to explore the circadian rhythm of ANP as a function of age. Circadian rhythms of plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone (PA), and cortisol (PC) were explored as well. Twenty clinically healthy subjects, 10 young (20-25 yrs) and 10 elderly (65-75 yrs), were investigated, while recumbent, after synchronization to light-dark regimen and meal timing. Blood samples for RIA tests were collected six times during the 24-hr span. The chronobiologic analysis in young subjects demonstrated a significant circadian rhythm for all the investigated variables with an acrophase-timing located at 16.48 for ANP, 4.44 for PRA, 5.32 for PA, and 7.12 for PC. In elderly subjects we documented an important increase of 24-hr mean plasma levels but not a statistically significant circadian rhythm for ANP, and a decrease in mean value of PRA which maintained, however, a significant periodic 24-hr oscillation in parallel with PA and PC. The results in young subjects reinforce the concept that ANP plays physiologically an inhibitory role on the phasic secretion of renin. The lack of the circadian rhythm for ANP along with the divergent changes in ANP and PRA 24-hr mean concentration of elderly subjects both suggest that ANP exerts with advancing age only a counterregulatory role on the tonic rather than the phasic release of renin.

Recently, a new immunometric assay (Cyfra 21-1) was developed to measure serum concentrations of a soluble fragment of cytokeratin subunit 19. With this method, supplied by Boehringer Mannheim (EIA Test Cyfra 21-1), an Italian multicenter trial was performed in patients with lung cancer. Cyfra 21-1 serum levels were determined in 568 normal subjects (blood donors), 607 patients with non-malignant diseases (491 respiratory diseases) and 730 patients with malignancies. In the latter group 584 had lung cancer. All these 584 patients had pathologically confirmed disease; 314 were epidermoid tumors, 166 adenocarcinomas, 88 small cell cancers and 16 large cell cancers. In the 568 healthy blood donors the mean Cyfra 21-1 value was 0.91 ng/ml (SD 0.47 ng/ml; range 0.05-2.90 ng/ml). A threshold of 1.9 ng/ml was chosen as the upper limit of normality. High levels of Cyfra 21-1 were observed in patients with chronic hepatitis (positivity rate: 17/51-33.3%) and with pancreatitis (positivity rate 5/16-31.3%). In 114 out of 491 (23.2%) patients with respiratory diseases Cyfra 21-1 showed values greater than 1.9 ng/ml. The overall sensitivity (all stages) of Cyfra 21-1 in lung cancer was 65.6% (383/584). When the histology was considered the highest positivity rates were found in patients with squamous cell tumors (226/314; 72%) followed by adenocarcinomas (105/166; 63%). In patients with SCLC the global sensitivity was 52.3% (46/88). Higher sensitivity of Cyfra 21-1 was observed from stage I to stage IV (53.9% vs 85.7%; Chi square: p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

Data collected in the 1993 and 1994 cycles of an international external quality assessment (EQA) program and in a national multicenter collaborative study were cumulatively analyzed to evaluate the standardization of the methods currently in use for the assay of mucinous tumor markers CA 19-9, CA 15-3 and CA 125. On average the between-laboratory variability was 15.2 and 16.0 CV% for CA 15-3 and CA 125 respectively; the between-laboratory variability found for CA 19-9 was markedly worse (mean 28.3 CV%). The variability component attributable to systematic differences between different methods/kits was relatively small for CA 15-3 and CA 125 (18% and 24% of the total variability) but markedly larger for CA 19-9 (48% of the total variability). The agreement of CA 19-9 results worsened in the last few years when new nonisotopic techniques became available. The precision of the methods/kits most used in the survey ranged from 9.9 to 13.3 CV% for CA 125 and from 11.6 to 13.9 CV% for CA 15-3. For these two tumor markers the precision of the traditional IRMAs does not appear different from that of the new fully automated nonisotopic techniques. The precision of CA 19-9 methods was on average worse (from 11.7 to 19.6 CV%) although two automated systems exhibited a precision better than that of IRMAs. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that CA 15-3 and CA 125 are satisfactorily assayed whereas CA 19-9 assay appears affected by larger differences between methods and by poorer precision of laboratories and kits.