2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Users as service innovators: The case of banking services

Abstract: Many services can be self-provided. An individual user or a user firm can, for example, choose to do its own accounting -choose to self-provide that service -instead of hiring an accounting firm to provide it. Since users can 'serve themselves' in many cases, it is also possible for users to innovate with respect to the services they self-provide. In this paper, we explore the histories of 47 functionally novel and important commercial and retail banking services. We find that, in 85% of these cases, users sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
164
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
164
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies underline the potential of involving customers, as this can result in more innovative service that has greater user value (Magnusson 2003). Additionally, as requirements of actors in a service system are often "sticky" information, significant costs are involved in eliciting these requirements in nonparticipatory design settings (Oliveira and von Hippel 2009). Hence, participatory design and prototyping approaches are also paramount for understanding successful engineering of highly accepted service systems.…”
Section: Towards Evidence-based Engineering: Scientific Methods Relevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies underline the potential of involving customers, as this can result in more innovative service that has greater user value (Magnusson 2003). Additionally, as requirements of actors in a service system are often "sticky" information, significant costs are involved in eliciting these requirements in nonparticipatory design settings (Oliveira and von Hippel 2009). Hence, participatory design and prototyping approaches are also paramount for understanding successful engineering of highly accepted service systems.…”
Section: Towards Evidence-based Engineering: Scientific Methods Relevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involving users to stimulate innovation (Athaide et al, 1996;Compeau et al, 2007;Franke & Von Hippel, 2003;Kristensson et al, 2002;Leimeister et al, 2009;Martin, 2011;Oliveira & Von Hippel, 2011;Raasch, 2011) Customisation Involving users in customisation of standard products and services (Athaide et al, 1996) User-Driven/Lead User Facilitating expert users with specialist competences in directing software innovation (Franke & Von Hippel, 2003;Kristensson et al, 2002;Morrison et al, 2000;Nambisan et al, 1999;Napier et al, 2011;Oliveira & Von Hippel, 2011) …”
Section: Knowledge Driver: User Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, this user innovation can be source of a successful commercial product. Sports equipment such as the rodeo kayak [1], mountain bike [2], snowboard [3], and surfboard [4], medical equipment [5], juvenile products such as the baby jogger [6], services such as computerized commercial banking services [7], computer games [8], and films in the animation genre [9] are few examples where user innovations was a success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%