2004
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2004.835945
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Plasma-Filled Diode for High Dose-Rate Bremsstrahlung

Abstract: A plasma-filled diode (PFD) technique is described for producing high dose-rate bremsstrahlung over small areas. A PFD was developed for this purpose using the Gamble II generator. For maximum dose-rate conditions, the short-circuit phase duration was 40 ns, after which the voltage increased to 1.8 MV and the total current in the diode was 0.5 MA. The X-ray pulsewidth was 8 ns, much less than the typical 50 ns pulsewidth with a vacuum diode. This PFD was adapted to the higher-current Saturn generator at 6-8 MA… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
20
4
0
0

Citation Types

0
8
0
0

Year Published

Range
2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
15
8

Relationship

0
23

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 23 publications

(8 citation statements)
references

References 16 publications

0
8
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In this paper, we demonstrate that the previous results also hold for a cylindrical shock wave, such as might be encountered in the geometry of z-pinch, imploding liner, or plasma-filled diode (PFD) experiments. [6][7][8] EMHD physics has been hypothesized to be applicable to PFD experiments 1 , and future research could compare the instability reported in this paper to experimental results. The main difference between a cylindrical and a planar EMHD magnetic shock is that the planar shock moves at constant speed, while the speed of the cylindrical shock depends on its radial location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In particular, the magnetic shock front can be unstable to a Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) like mode, which will break the shock front apart into vortices that propagate faster than the shock front itself is predicted to move. This effect was examined for the cylindrical model by first doing linear stability calculations of a cylindrical shock front, and then computing solutions to the full 2D equations ( 6) and (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation