La distribution des restaurants dans le centre de Toulouse

Abstract

La distribution spatiale des restaurants à Toulouse obéit à des logiques que le découpage administratif en quartiers ne permet pas toujours de comprendre. D'où cette tentative de décrire l'organisation interne de cette répartition à partir de quelques critères recueillis par enquête directe auprès de 395 établissements ouverts en mai 1985. La combinaison des indicateurs : prix minimum du repas, mode de restauration et type de cuisine, a permis de caractériser 34 « unités spatiales de restauration » dont la distribution dans Toulouse suggère une certaine cohérence entre les activités, l'histoire de l'espace urbain et l'évolution de la restauration elle-même.

Understanding drinking-and-eating-together-spaces distribution in Madrid: A socio-spatial approach

“…If a count of Madrid’s DETS is to be made, it must be proposed in terms of location and distribution, following theories that explain the spread of bars, cafés and restaurants in a city as an intertwining between traditional factors like demand, price of land or accessibility and non-traditional factors like type of food or reputation (Kowalczyk, 2020). This exercise has been undertaken by various works through urban sociology and geography scholarships, from classical theories such as Burgess’ concentric zone model (Burgess, 2008 [1925]), Hoyt’s sector theory (Hoyt, 2018 [1939]) or Harris and Ullman multiple nuclei proposal (Harris and Ullman, 1945), to more complex and contemporary studies, both theoretical (Kearsley, 1983) and empirical (Clément and Megdiche, 1987; Pillsbury, 1987).…”

Understanding drinking-and-eating-together-spaces distribution in Madrid: A socio-spatial approach

“…If a count of Madrid’s DETS is to be made, it must be proposed in terms of location and distribution, following theories that explain the spread of bars, cafés and restaurants in a city as an intertwining between traditional factors like demand, price of land or accessibility and non-traditional factors like type of food or reputation (Kowalczyk, 2020). This exercise has been undertaken by various works through urban sociology and geography scholarships, from classical theories such as Burgess’ concentric zone model (Burgess, 2008 [1925]), Hoyt’s sector theory (Hoyt, 2018 [1939]) or Harris and Ullman multiple nuclei proposal (Harris and Ullman, 1945), to more complex and contemporary studies, both theoretical (Kearsley, 1983) and empirical (Clément and Megdiche, 1987; Pillsbury, 1987).…”

Understanding drinking-and-eating-together-spaces distribution in Madrid: A socio-spatial approach

“…If a count of Madrid’s DETS is to be made, it must be proposed in terms of location and distribution, following theories that explain the spread of bars, cafés and restaurants in a city as an intertwining between traditional factors like demand, price of land or accessibility and non-traditional factors like type of food or reputation (Kowalczyk, 2020). This exercise has been undertaken by various works through urban sociology and geography scholarships, from classical theories such as Burgess’ concentric zone model (Burgess, 2008 [1925]), Hoyt’s sector theory (Hoyt, 2018 [1939]) or Harris and Ullman multiple nuclei proposal (Harris and Ullman, 1945), to more complex and contemporary studies, both theoretical (Kearsley, 1983) and empirical (Clément and Megdiche, 1987; Pillsbury, 1987).…”

Understanding drinking-and-eating-together-spaces distribution in Madrid: A socio-spatial approach

“…If a count of Madrid’s DETS is to be made, it must be proposed in terms of location and distribution, following theories that explain the spread of bars, cafés and restaurants in a city as an intertwining between traditional factors like demand, price of land or accessibility and non-traditional factors like type of food or reputation (Kowalczyk, 2020). This exercise has been undertaken by various works through urban sociology and geography scholarships, from classical theories such as Burgess’ concentric zone model (Burgess, 2008 [1925]), Hoyt’s sector theory (Hoyt, 2018 [1939]) or Harris and Ullman multiple nuclei proposal (Harris and Ullman, 1945), to more complex and contemporary studies, both theoretical (Kearsley, 1983) and empirical (Clément and Megdiche, 1987; Pillsbury, 1987).…”