2020
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Persistent positivity and fluctuations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinically-recovered COVID-19 patients
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
41
26
13
2
Citation Types
4
54
1
0
Year Published
Range
2020
20202026
2026Publication Types
Select...
62
9
8
Relationship
1
78
Authors
Journals
Cited by 79 publications
(59 citation statements)
References 6 publications
4
54
1
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…High levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation implied that the immune response had not subsided, and that the patient was excreting viral fragments, leading to the detection of re-positive results; thus, SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation was positively correlated with re-positivity. Some previous studies have found that interleukin 6, lung images, age, sore throat, nasopharyngeal viral load and inefficient viral clearance were predictors of re-positivity [10,23,[26][27][28]. However, no correlation was found between age and re-positivity in our study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the large proportion of patients with a re-positive result, we recommend that the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of patients with COVID-19 should be increased before discharge to reduce the re-positivity rate after discharge [22]. Similar to our results, the re-positivity rate in the study by Cento et al [10] was 46.9%. However, some studies have reported lower re-positivity rates of 3-25% [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…High levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation implied that the immune response had not subsided, and that the patient was excreting viral fragments, leading to the detection of re-positive results; thus, SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation was positively correlated with re-positivity. Some previous studies have found that interleukin 6, lung images, age, sore throat, nasopharyngeal viral load and inefficient viral clearance were predictors of re-positivity [10,23,[26][27][28]. However, no correlation was found between age and re-positivity in our study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the large proportion of patients with a re-positive result, we recommend that the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of patients with COVID-19 should be increased before discharge to reduce the re-positivity rate after discharge [22]. Similar to our results, the re-positivity rate in the study by Cento et al [10] was 46.9%. However, some studies have reported lower re-positivity rates of 3-25% [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another critical issue is the fluctuations that can be seen in the COVID-19 PCR test. This situation has also been reported in the literature 6,7 . In our study, we observed fluctuations in the PCR results of 2 different patients as positive, negative, positive, and negative (respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It has been widely documented that positive RT-PCR tests might occur weeks after recovery for SARS-CoV-2 sometimes following previous negative results. 19, 28-30 This is compatible with the hypothesis that re-positive cases who recovered from previous infections before departure would be very unlikely to be contagious. 31 Conversely, some cases with a negative RT-PCR result at arrival were detected during or after quarantine with lower Ct values were more likely due to infections acquired during quarantine (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…High levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation implied that the immune response had not subsided, and that the patient was excreting viral fragments, leading to the detection of re-positive results; thus, SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation was positively correlated with re-positivity. Some previous studies have found that interleukin 6, lung images, age, sore throat, nasopharyngeal viral load and inefficient viral clearance were predictors of re-positivity [10,23,[26][27][28]. However, no correlation was found between age and re-positivity in our study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the large proportion of patients with a re-positive result, we recommend that the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of patients with COVID-19 should be increased before discharge to reduce the re-positivity rate after discharge [22]. Similar to our results, the re-positivity rate in the study by Cento et al [10] was 46.9%. However, some studies have reported lower re-positivity rates of 3-25% [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another critical issue is the fluctuations that can be seen in the COVID-19 PCR test. This situation has also been reported in the literature 6,7 . In our study, we observed fluctuations in the PCR results of 2 different patients as positive, negative, positive, and negative (respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It has been widely documented that positive RT-PCR tests might occur weeks after recovery for SARS-CoV-2 sometimes following previous negative results. 19, 28-30 This is compatible with the hypothesis that re-positive cases who recovered from previous infections before departure would be very unlikely to be contagious. 31 Conversely, some cases with a negative RT-PCR result at arrival were detected during or after quarantine with lower Ct values were more likely due to infections acquired during quarantine (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…High levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation implied that the immune response had not subsided, and that the patient was excreting viral fragments, leading to the detection of re-positive results; thus, SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation was positively correlated with re-positivity. Some previous studies have found that interleukin 6, lung images, age, sore throat, nasopharyngeal viral load and inefficient viral clearance were predictors of re-positivity [10,23,[26][27][28]. However, no correlation was found between age and re-positivity in our study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the large proportion of patients with a re-positive result, we recommend that the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of patients with COVID-19 should be increased before discharge to reduce the re-positivity rate after discharge [22]. Similar to our results, the re-positivity rate in the study by Cento et al [10] was 46.9%. However, some studies have reported lower re-positivity rates of 3-25% [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another critical issue is the fluctuations that can be seen in the COVID-19 PCR test. This situation has also been reported in the literature 6,7 . In our study, we observed fluctuations in the PCR results of 2 different patients as positive, negative, positive, and negative (respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It has been widely documented that positive RT-PCR tests might occur weeks after recovery for SARS-CoV-2 sometimes following previous negative results. 19, 28-30 This is compatible with the hypothesis that re-positive cases who recovered from previous infections before departure would be very unlikely to be contagious. 31 Conversely, some cases with a negative RT-PCR result at arrival were detected during or after quarantine with lower Ct values were more likely due to infections acquired during quarantine (e.g.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 81%