2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.024
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Persistent positivity and fluctuations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinically-recovered COVID-19 patients

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
41
26
13
2

Citation Types

4
54
1
0

Year Published

Range
2020
2020
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
62
9
8

Relationship

1
78

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 79 publications

(59 citation statements)
references

References 6 publications

4
54
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…High levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation implied that the immune response had not subsided, and that the patient was excreting viral fragments, leading to the detection of re-positive results; thus, SARS-CoV-2 IgM in patients during quarantine and rehabilitation was positively correlated with re-positivity. Some previous studies have found that interleukin 6, lung images, age, sore throat, nasopharyngeal viral load and inefficient viral clearance were predictors of re-positivity [10,23,[26][27][28]. However, no correlation was found between age and re-positivity in our study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the large proportion of patients with a re-positive result, we recommend that the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of patients with COVID-19 should be increased before discharge to reduce the re-positivity rate after discharge [22]. Similar to our results, the re-positivity rate in the study by Cento et al [10] was 46.9%. However, some studies have reported lower re-positivity rates of 3-25% [23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation