2010
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Particle velocity detection and measurement in two-phase flow using combined electronic logic system and LDA technique
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
6
2
0
0
Citation Types
1
7
0
0
Year Published
Range
2014
20142026
2026Publication Types
Select...
7
Relationship
0
7
Authors
Journals
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
References 26 publications
1
7
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Increasing solids fraction leads to an increase in the drag force on the particles, propelling the particle motion in the streamwise direction, as has been observed in other experiments (Tsuji et al 1984). However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200. The data from Lee & Durst (1982) were for lower concentrations and Reynolds number (0.06 % v/v and Re = 8000).…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of the results presented in figure 15, the observed enhancement of solid axial fluctuations with increasing solids concentration is likely to be due to (iii) the effect of the enhanced fluid fluctuations. Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations. Figure 15(b,c) shows that the radial and theta components of the solids velocity fluctuations present no significant influence of the particle concentration at these conditions.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Increasing solids fraction leads to an increase in the drag force on the particles, propelling the particle motion in the streamwise direction, as has been observed in other experiments (Tsuji et al 1984). However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200. The data from Lee & Durst (1982) were for lower concentrations and Reynolds number (0.06 % v/v and Re = 8000).…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of the results presented in figure 15, the observed enhancement of solid axial fluctuations with increasing solids concentration is likely to be due to (iii) the effect of the enhanced fluid fluctuations. Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations. Figure 15(b,c) shows that the radial and theta components of the solids velocity fluctuations present no significant influence of the particle concentration at these conditions.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, some researchers have also applied the technique to study multiphase flows using LDA or PDA (an extension of LDA). One of these studies involved using a LDA device incorporating an electronic logic system to distinguish signals from water and solid particles in a low solid volumetric concentration (less than 2%) two phase system (solid-liquid suspension) (Sad Chemloul and Benmedjedi, 2010). The beauty of their approach was that electronic logic was employed to speed up the signal processing but unfortunately it was not sufficient to overcome LDA's intrinsic sensitivity to solid concentration.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Anemometry (Lda)
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Increasing solids fraction leads to an increase in the drag force on the particles, propelling the particle motion in the streamwise direction, as has been observed in other experiments (Tsuji et al 1984). However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200. The data from Lee & Durst (1982) were for lower concentrations and Reynolds number (0.06 % v/v and Re = 8000).…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of the results presented in figure 15, the observed enhancement of solid axial fluctuations with increasing solids concentration is likely to be due to (iii) the effect of the enhanced fluid fluctuations. Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations. Figure 15(b,c) shows that the radial and theta components of the solids velocity fluctuations present no significant influence of the particle concentration at these conditions.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, some researchers have also applied the technique to study multiphase flows using LDA or PDA (an extension of LDA). One of these studies involved using a LDA device incorporating an electronic logic system to distinguish signals from water and solid particles in a low solid volumetric concentration (less than 2%) two phase system (solid-liquid suspension) (Sad Chemloul and Benmedjedi, 2010). The beauty of their approach was that electronic logic was employed to speed up the signal processing but unfortunately it was not sufficient to overcome LDA's intrinsic sensitivity to solid concentration.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Anemometry (Lda)
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Increasing solids fraction leads to an increase in the drag force on the particles, propelling the particle motion in the streamwise direction, as has been observed in other experiments (Tsuji et al 1984). However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, Lee & Durst (1982) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured increasing relative velocities with increasing concentrations. The data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were taken in a similar range of concentrations as the present data but at a lower Reynolds number of 16 200. The data from Lee & Durst (1982) were for lower concentrations and Reynolds number (0.06 % v/v and Re = 8000).…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of the results presented in figure 15, the observed enhancement of solid axial fluctuations with increasing solids concentration is likely to be due to (iii) the effect of the enhanced fluid fluctuations. Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hardalupas et al (1989), Kulick et al (1994) and Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) measured solid fluctuating velocities that decreased with increasing concentration. Their experiments were performed at similar Stokes numbers but at much lower Reynolds numbers (Re = 13 000, 13 800 and 16 200, respectively) and only the data from Chemloul & Benmedjedi (2010) were collected at similar concentrations. Figure 15(b,c) shows that the radial and theta components of the solids velocity fluctuations present no significant influence of the particle concentration at these conditions.…”
Section: Effects Of the Solids Concentration
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, some researchers have also applied the technique to study multiphase flows using LDA or PDA (an extension of LDA). One of these studies involved using a LDA device incorporating an electronic logic system to distinguish signals from water and solid particles in a low solid volumetric concentration (less than 2%) two phase system (solid-liquid suspension) (Sad Chemloul and Benmedjedi, 2010). The beauty of their approach was that electronic logic was employed to speed up the signal processing but unfortunately it was not sufficient to overcome LDA's intrinsic sensitivity to solid concentration.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Anemometry (Lda)
mentioning
confidence: 99%