2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0037(200007)35:4<274::aid-net6>3.0.co;2-6
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Orthogonal (g, f)-factorizations in networks
Abstract: Let G = (V, E) be a graph and let g and f be two integer-valued functions defined on V, k and shown that there are polynomial-time algorithms to find the desired (g, f )-factorizations.
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
24
2
0
0
Citation Types
0
5
0
0
Year Published
Range
2001
20012025
2025Publication Types
Select...
20
4
1
Relationship
3
22
Authors
Journals
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
References 11 publications
0
5
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The following lemma, whose proof can be shown by Lam et al [7], Li et al [10] and Liu et al [9], is useful for verifying our main theorem. Lemma 2.1 ( [7,9,10]). Let G be a graph, and let g, f :…”
Section: Lemmas
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Li and Liu [9] verified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)graph admits a (g, f )-factorization orthogonal to any given m-subgraph, which is an improvement of Liu's previous result [11]. Lam et al [7] justified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)-graph admits a (g, f )factorization orthogonal to k vertex-disjoint m-subgraphs if k ≤ g(x) ≤ f (x) for any x ∈ V (G), which is a generalization of Li and Liu's previous result [9]. Li et al [10] investigated the existence of a subgraph with orthogonal factorization in an (mg + k, mf − k)-graph.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The following lemma, whose proof can be shown by Lam et al [7], Li et al [10] and Liu et al [9], is useful for verifying our main theorem. Lemma 2.1 ( [7,9,10]). Let G be a graph, and let g, f :…”
Section: Lemmas
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Li and Liu [9] verified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)graph admits a (g, f )-factorization orthogonal to any given m-subgraph, which is an improvement of Liu's previous result [11]. Lam et al [7] justified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)-graph admits a (g, f )factorization orthogonal to k vertex-disjoint m-subgraphs if k ≤ g(x) ≤ f (x) for any x ∈ V (G), which is a generalization of Li and Liu's previous result [9]. Li et al [10] investigated the existence of a subgraph with orthogonal factorization in an (mg + k, mf − k)-graph.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Then β(S, T ; E 1 , E 2 ) = 2|E 2 ∩ E G (T )| + |E 2 ∩ E G (T, U )| = 0. It follows from(7)and(8) again that α(S, T ; E 1 , E 2 ) = 0. Thus, |E 1 | 1, and then E 1 = {e 1 } or E 1 = {e 1 , e 2 }.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For an undirected graph, Alspach [2] posed the following problem: given a subgraph H, does there exist a factorization F of G with some fixed type orthogonal to H? Liu et al [4,[7][8][9][10] discussed the orthogonal (g, f )-factorizations of graphs. Kano [6] studied the [a, b]-factorizations in graphs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The following lemma, whose proof can be shown by Lam et al [7], Li et al [10] and Liu et al [9], is useful for verifying our main theorem. Lemma 2.1 ( [7,9,10]). Let G be a graph, and let g, f :…”
Section: Lemmas
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Li and Liu [9] verified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)graph admits a (g, f )-factorization orthogonal to any given m-subgraph, which is an improvement of Liu's previous result [11]. Lam et al [7] justified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)-graph admits a (g, f )factorization orthogonal to k vertex-disjoint m-subgraphs if k ≤ g(x) ≤ f (x) for any x ∈ V (G), which is a generalization of Li and Liu's previous result [9]. Li et al [10] investigated the existence of a subgraph with orthogonal factorization in an (mg + k, mf − k)-graph.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Then β(S, T ; E 1 , E 2 ) = 2|E 2 ∩ E G (T )| + |E 2 ∩ E G (T, U )| = 0. It follows from(7)and(8) again that α(S, T ; E 1 , E 2 ) = 0. Thus, |E 1 | 1, and then E 1 = {e 1 } or E 1 = {e 1 , e 2 }.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For an undirected graph, Alspach [2] posed the following problem: given a subgraph H, does there exist a factorization F of G with some fixed type orthogonal to H? Liu et al [4,[7][8][9][10] discussed the orthogonal (g, f )-factorizations of graphs. Kano [6] studied the [a, b]-factorizations in graphs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The following lemma, whose proof can be shown by Lam et al [7], Li et al [10] and Liu et al [9], is useful for verifying our main theorem. Lemma 2.1 ( [7,9,10]). Let G be a graph, and let g, f :…”
Section: Lemmas
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Li and Liu [9] verified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)graph admits a (g, f )-factorization orthogonal to any given m-subgraph, which is an improvement of Liu's previous result [11]. Lam et al [7] justified that every (mg + m − 1, mf − m + 1)-graph admits a (g, f )factorization orthogonal to k vertex-disjoint m-subgraphs if k ≤ g(x) ≤ f (x) for any x ∈ V (G), which is a generalization of Li and Liu's previous result [9]. Li et al [10] investigated the existence of a subgraph with orthogonal factorization in an (mg + k, mf − k)-graph.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 81%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Then β(S, T ; E 1 , E 2 ) = 2|E 2 ∩ E G (T )| + |E 2 ∩ E G (T, U )| = 0. It follows from(7)and(8) again that α(S, T ; E 1 , E 2 ) = 0. Thus, |E 1 | 1, and then E 1 = {e 1 } or E 1 = {e 1 , e 2 }.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For an undirected graph, Alspach [2] posed the following problem: given a subgraph H, does there exist a factorization F of G with some fixed type orthogonal to H? Liu et al [4,[7][8][9][10] discussed the orthogonal (g, f )-factorizations of graphs. Kano [6] studied the [a, b]-factorizations in graphs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%