Mechanical Properties Evaluation of Three Different Materials for Implant Supported Overdenture: An In-Vitro Study

Abstract

Aim: the aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength and elastic modulus of three-dimensionally (3D) printed, conventional heat-cured, and high-impact implant-supported overdenture materials specimens. Materials and Methods: Thirty implant-supported overdenture materials specimens (bar-shaped, 65.0 × 10.2 × 5.1 ± 0.2 mm3) with one central hole were fabricated using 3D-printed, heat-cured conventional, and high-impact denture base resins (n = 10/group). Autopolymerizing acrylic resin was used to attach titanium matrix housings to the central holes of the specimens. A three-point bending test was conducted using a universal testing machine and a model analog with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The indicative flexural strength and elastic modulus were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey tests at α = 0.05. Results: One-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of denture base material on the flexural strength (p < 0.001) but not on the elastic modulus (p = 0.451) of the evaluated materials. The flexural strength of the 3D-printed specimens (95.99 ± 9.87 MPa) was significantly higher than the conventional (77.18 ± 9.69 MPa; p < 0.001) and high-impact ones (82.74 ± 7.73 MPa; p = 0.002). Conclusions: The maximum flexural strength was observed in the 3D-printed implant-supported overdenture material specimens, which might indicate their suitability as an alternative to the conventionally fabricated ones. Flexural strength and elastic modulus of conventional and high-impact heat-cured implant-supported overdenture materials specimens were comparable.

Clinical Management of Worn Ball Abutments in Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdentures: A Case Report in a Skeletal Class II Patient

“…3D-printed implant-supported overdenture materials exhibit the highest flexural strength, whereas conventional and high-impact heat-cured acrylics show comparable mechanical properties. Reinforcing the overdenture with a metal framework—particularly digitally fabricated designs that integrate the attachment housing—enhances rigidity, strengthens the denture base, and reduces fracture risk around implant abutments [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”

Clinical Management of Worn Ball Abutments in Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdentures: A Case Report in a Skeletal Class II Patient

“…3D-printed implant-supported overdenture materials exhibit the highest flexural strength, whereas conventional and high-impact heat-cured acrylics show comparable mechanical properties. Reinforcing the overdenture with a metal framework—particularly digitally fabricated designs that integrate the attachment housing—enhances rigidity, strengthens the denture base, and reduces fracture risk around implant abutments [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”

Clinical Management of Worn Ball Abutments in Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdentures: A Case Report in a Skeletal Class II Patient

“…3D-printed implant-supported overdenture materials exhibit the highest flexural strength, whereas conventional and high-impact heat-cured acrylics show comparable mechanical properties. Reinforcing the overdenture with a metal framework—particularly digitally fabricated designs that integrate the attachment housing—enhances rigidity, strengthens the denture base, and reduces fracture risk around implant abutments [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”

Clinical Management of Worn Ball Abutments in Mandibular Mini-Implant Overdentures: A Case Report in a Skeletal Class II Patient

“…3D-printed implant-supported overdenture materials exhibit the highest flexural strength, whereas conventional and high-impact heat-cured acrylics show comparable mechanical properties. Reinforcing the overdenture with a metal framework—particularly digitally fabricated designs that integrate the attachment housing—enhances rigidity, strengthens the denture base, and reduces fracture risk around implant abutments [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”