2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001jb000710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal structure and relocated earthquakes in the Puget Lowland, Washington, from high‐resolution seismic tomography

Abstract: The availability of regional earthquake data from the Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (PNSN), together with active source data from the Seismic Hazards Investigation in Puget Sound (SHIPS) seismic experiments, has allowed us to construct a new high‐resolution 3‐D, P wave velocity model of the crust to a depth of about 30 km in the central Puget Lowland. In our method, earthquake hypocenters and velocity model are jointly coupled in a fully nonlinear tomographic inversion. Active source data constrain the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(162 reference statements)
7
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no direct evidence for the presence of this fault from the tomographic velocity models constructed by Symons and Crosson (1997), Brocher et al, (2001) Van Wagoner et al, (2002), and Ramachandran et al, (2006). This fault could not be inferred previously from the tomographic velocity models due to the smooth nature of the velocity variations (see top panel of Figs.…”
Section: Coast Range Boundary Faultmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no direct evidence for the presence of this fault from the tomographic velocity models constructed by Symons and Crosson (1997), Brocher et al, (2001) Van Wagoner et al, (2002), and Ramachandran et al, (2006). This fault could not be inferred previously from the tomographic velocity models due to the smooth nature of the velocity variations (see top panel of Figs.…”
Section: Coast Range Boundary Faultmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1) forms the eastern boundary of the Eocene volcanic rocks (Johnson, 1984(Johnson, , 1985Johnson et al 1996). CRBF is inferred mainly from tectonic and sedimentologic evidence to lie beneath the eastern Puget Lowland where it strikes approximately N-S (Van Wagoner et al, 2002). Northward motion of the Cascadia forearc region during the early Tertiary may have been accommodated along this right-lateral strike-slip fault, which presumably separates rocks of the Coast Range terrane from the pre-Tertiary basement of the Cascades (Johnson, 1984(Johnson, , 1985Johnson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Coast Range Boundary Faultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The black rectangles show the Tacoma and Olympia study light detection and ranging (LiDAR) maps shown in Figures 2a and 6a, respectively. Heavy dashed lines outline the Tacoma, Seattle, and Everett basins, as determined by the 4:25 km=sec contour on a tomography image at 2.5 km depth (Van Wagoner et al, 2002). SWIF: Southern Whidbey Island fault.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Mary Templeton for reviewing this manuscript. shows the speed of sound at 2.5 km depth derived from a regional tomographic study (VanWagoner et al, 2002). The blue dots are the locations of the Seattle SHIPS seismometer sites.…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Seattle SHIPS experiment was designed to deploy and maintain a 3 -dimensional array of 87 similar seismographs distributed over the Seattle basin (Figures 1 and 2; Johnson et al, 1994;Pratt et al, 1997;Brocher et al, 2001a;VanWagoner et al, 2002). One set of 26 seismographs was deployed along an east-west line across the center of the basin and onto bedrock at both ends, approximately coincident with the 1999 SHIPS refraction profile (Brocher et al, 2000b;Snelson, 2001;Pratt et al, 2003).…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%