A multiparametric evaluation of post-restored teeth with simulated bone loss

Influence of alveolar bone height on the biomechanical behavior of roots restored with custom‐made posts‐and‐cores

“…Few studies have investigated the alveolar bone height factor in the compression force resistance of teeth restored with posts, which makes it difficult to compare results. However, our results are consistent with reported data from previous studies 22,23,24,25 . In addition, a study by Naumann et al, which investigated the compression force resistance of maxillary incisors restored with prefabricated glass fiber posts, with three alveolar bone heights (normal height, 25% and 50% horizontal bone loss), observed that the compression force resistance decreased proportionally to the increase in alveolar bone loss 26 …”

Influence of alveolar bone height on the biomechanical behavior of roots restored with custom‐made posts‐and‐cores

“…Few studies have investigated the alveolar bone height factor in the compression force resistance of teeth restored with posts, which makes it difficult to compare results. However, our results are consistent with reported data from previous studies 22,23,24,25 . In addition, a study by Naumann et al, which investigated the compression force resistance of maxillary incisors restored with prefabricated glass fiber posts, with three alveolar bone heights (normal height, 25% and 50% horizontal bone loss), observed that the compression force resistance decreased proportionally to the increase in alveolar bone loss 26 …”

The Impact of Bonding Agents and Bone Defects on the Fracture Resistance of Reattached Vertically Root-Fractured Teeth

“…Additionally, teeth samples with larger bone defects, such as V-shaped and step bone loss, exhibited a higher incidence of unfavorable fractures. The findings by Komada et al [59] and Ni et al [60] confirmed that samples with bone loss are more prone to experiencing unfavorable root fractures than those with favorable bone levels. People with normal occlusion typically have a maximum molar bite force ranging from 465 to 522 N. The results indicate that teeth samples re-bonded with RMGI and DCRC exhibit higher fracture resistance than the expected masticatory force for vertical root fractures.…”

Effect of fiber post length and bone level on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

“…On the other hand, a study by Komada et al 23) -which investigated the fracture resistance of extracted mandibular premolars restored with different post materials, no crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 5 mm below CEJ) -found no significant differences in fracture resistance between the two levels of bone loss. A study by Ni et al 24) -which investigated the fracture resistance of singlerooted premolars restored with GFPs, metal alloy crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 6 mm below CEJ) -also found no statistical differences in fracture resistance between the different bone levels. In the present study, results did not show any difference in terms of fracture resistance between different bone levels.…”

“…Data on the influence of bone level on fracture type are conflicting, thus rendering the role of bone support debatable. Komada et al 23) and Ni et al 24) found that specimens with bone loss showed more unrestorable root fractures than those with normal bone level. Naumann et al 22) obtained less uniform data, with different fracture types exhibited for different levels of bone loss.…”

Influence of alveolar bone height on the biomechanical behavior of roots restored with custom‐made posts‐and‐cores

“…Few studies have investigated the alveolar bone height factor in the compression force resistance of teeth restored with posts, which makes it difficult to compare results. However, our results are consistent with reported data from previous studies 22,23,24,25 . In addition, a study by Naumann et al, which investigated the compression force resistance of maxillary incisors restored with prefabricated glass fiber posts, with three alveolar bone heights (normal height, 25% and 50% horizontal bone loss), observed that the compression force resistance decreased proportionally to the increase in alveolar bone loss 26 …”

The Impact of Bonding Agents and Bone Defects on the Fracture Resistance of Reattached Vertically Root-Fractured Teeth

“…Additionally, teeth samples with larger bone defects, such as V-shaped and step bone loss, exhibited a higher incidence of unfavorable fractures. The findings by Komada et al [59] and Ni et al [60] confirmed that samples with bone loss are more prone to experiencing unfavorable root fractures than those with favorable bone levels. People with normal occlusion typically have a maximum molar bite force ranging from 465 to 522 N. The results indicate that teeth samples re-bonded with RMGI and DCRC exhibit higher fracture resistance than the expected masticatory force for vertical root fractures.…”

Effect of fiber post length and bone level on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

“…On the other hand, a study by Komada et al 23) -which investigated the fracture resistance of extracted mandibular premolars restored with different post materials, no crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 5 mm below CEJ) -found no significant differences in fracture resistance between the two levels of bone loss. A study by Ni et al 24) -which investigated the fracture resistance of singlerooted premolars restored with GFPs, metal alloy crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 6 mm below CEJ) -also found no statistical differences in fracture resistance between the different bone levels. In the present study, results did not show any difference in terms of fracture resistance between different bone levels.…”

“…Data on the influence of bone level on fracture type are conflicting, thus rendering the role of bone support debatable. Komada et al 23) and Ni et al 24) found that specimens with bone loss showed more unrestorable root fractures than those with normal bone level. Naumann et al 22) obtained less uniform data, with different fracture types exhibited for different levels of bone loss.…”

Influence of alveolar bone height on the biomechanical behavior of roots restored with custom‐made posts‐and‐cores

“…Few studies have investigated the alveolar bone height factor in the compression force resistance of teeth restored with posts, which makes it difficult to compare results. However, our results are consistent with reported data from previous studies 22,23,24,25 . In addition, a study by Naumann et al, which investigated the compression force resistance of maxillary incisors restored with prefabricated glass fiber posts, with three alveolar bone heights (normal height, 25% and 50% horizontal bone loss), observed that the compression force resistance decreased proportionally to the increase in alveolar bone loss 26 …”

The Impact of Bonding Agents and Bone Defects on the Fracture Resistance of Reattached Vertically Root-Fractured Teeth

“…Additionally, teeth samples with larger bone defects, such as V-shaped and step bone loss, exhibited a higher incidence of unfavorable fractures. The findings by Komada et al [59] and Ni et al [60] confirmed that samples with bone loss are more prone to experiencing unfavorable root fractures than those with favorable bone levels. People with normal occlusion typically have a maximum molar bite force ranging from 465 to 522 N. The results indicate that teeth samples re-bonded with RMGI and DCRC exhibit higher fracture resistance than the expected masticatory force for vertical root fractures.…”

Effect of fiber post length and bone level on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

“…On the other hand, a study by Komada et al 23) -which investigated the fracture resistance of extracted mandibular premolars restored with different post materials, no crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 5 mm below CEJ) -found no significant differences in fracture resistance between the two levels of bone loss. A study by Ni et al 24) -which investigated the fracture resistance of singlerooted premolars restored with GFPs, metal alloy crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 6 mm below CEJ) -also found no statistical differences in fracture resistance between the different bone levels. In the present study, results did not show any difference in terms of fracture resistance between different bone levels.…”

“…Data on the influence of bone level on fracture type are conflicting, thus rendering the role of bone support debatable. Komada et al 23) and Ni et al 24) found that specimens with bone loss showed more unrestorable root fractures than those with normal bone level. Naumann et al 22) obtained less uniform data, with different fracture types exhibited for different levels of bone loss.…”