2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiparametric evaluation of post-restored teeth with simulated bone loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a study by Komada et al 23) -which investigated the fracture resistance of extracted mandibular premolars restored with different post materials, no crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 5 mm below CEJ) -found no significant differences in fracture resistance between the two levels of bone loss. A study by Ni et al 24) -which investigated the fracture resistance of singlerooted premolars restored with GFPs, metal alloy crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 6 mm below CEJ) -also found no statistical differences in fracture resistance between the different bone levels. In the present study, results did not show any difference in terms of fracture resistance between different bone levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, a study by Komada et al 23) -which investigated the fracture resistance of extracted mandibular premolars restored with different post materials, no crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 5 mm below CEJ) -found no significant differences in fracture resistance between the two levels of bone loss. A study by Ni et al 24) -which investigated the fracture resistance of singlerooted premolars restored with GFPs, metal alloy crowns, and two different bone levels (2 or 6 mm below CEJ) -also found no statistical differences in fracture resistance between the different bone levels. In the present study, results did not show any difference in terms of fracture resistance between different bone levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Data on the influence of bone level on fracture type are conflicting, thus rendering the role of bone support debatable. Komada et al 23) and Ni et al 24) found that specimens with bone loss showed more unrestorable root fractures than those with normal bone level. Naumann et al 22) obtained less uniform data, with different fracture types exhibited for different levels of bone loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal of pulp and root dentin diminishes a protective feedback mechanism and reduces the stress-strain capacity of the teeth, compromising the root fracture resistance [4,28]. The stability of the teeth is reduced by endodontic preparative procedures, leading to more root deformations and less stiffness [29,30]. The success of restoration techniques for endodontically treated teeth is dependent upon variations in length, diameter and shape of a post.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the periodontal status on the survival of endodontically treated teeth was observed [43,44]. As the height and density of the alveolar bone changes, tooth mobility increases due to the reduced support, altered centers of resistance and the associated increased moment of force [30]. A finite element study suggested that dentin stresses were 4-10 times higher than in teeth with normal bone height when the bone height is 6 mm below the cemento-enamel junction [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodontitis not only causes bone loss, but also increases the failure rate of endodontic treatments [12]. A linear relationship was discovered between the amount of horizontal bone loss and the magnitude of force encountered by restored teeth [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%