2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Users’ Preferences towards Automated Road Public Transport: Results from European Surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two types of shared mobility services based on AVs are considered to replace individual car use providing occasionally a door-to-door but mostly a feeder service: shared minivan with 8 seats and shared minibus with 16 seats [19]. In other studies, small capacity autonomous pods are considered also as a feeder service [10], [12]. Furthermore, autonomous cars may provide last-mile service with or without seat capacity sharing [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two types of shared mobility services based on AVs are considered to replace individual car use providing occasionally a door-to-door but mostly a feeder service: shared minivan with 8 seats and shared minibus with 16 seats [19]. In other studies, small capacity autonomous pods are considered also as a feeder service [10], [12]. Furthermore, autonomous cars may provide last-mile service with or without seat capacity sharing [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a strong correlation between individual's modal split and willingness to choose a shared service based on an AV [11]. Service attributes including travel cost, travel time and waiting time may be critical factors for the use of shared AVs [12]. The lack of personnel would be one of the most concerned issues (e.g.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Half of the studies (7 of 14) can be found in journals and the other half (7) were published in conference proceedings. Almost all of these studies (12 of 14) were from Europe [22,[24][25][26][27][28][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Only one study focused on the United States [23], and another considered both the United States and India [29].…”
Section: Eme #2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief summary of the key findings pertaining to user acceptance is presented here. Most studies concluded that users (who have experienced riding on an autonomous bus) and potential users (such as those who currently ride conventional buses but have not yet ridden in a driverless bus) generally have positive attitudes toward autonomous buses [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][30][31][32]. Notably, the experience of actually riding in an autonomous bus or living in a city where autonomous buses operate generally improved user acceptance and perceptions of this new technology [28,33,34].…”
Section: Eme #2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Door-to-door, shared service [10] • Feeder service to high-capacity public transportation [11,12] • Combination of the previous types [13,14] Personalized, flexible, door-to-door service can be provided mostly in rarely built-up areas because of the road capacity limitations. Consequently, in densely populated and highly urbanized areas, feeder service should be provided [13,15].…”
Section: Alteration Of Mobility Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%