2010
DOI: 10.4314/thrb.v11i4.50176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Users’ perceptions of outpatient quality of care in Kilosa District Hospital in Central Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been reported elsewhere in Tanzania and Ethiopia [5,7,17]. The reasons could be due to level of patient's expectations that differed between these two groups and time spent during the process of care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings have been reported elsewhere in Tanzania and Ethiopia [5,7,17]. The reasons could be due to level of patient's expectations that differed between these two groups and time spent during the process of care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Nigeria 84% are satisfied while in Ethiopia 77% are satisfied with the health services rendered at the OPD [3][4][5]. In Tanzania, at Muhimbili National Hospital satisfaction level was found to be high (90%-95%) while in Morogoro (Kilosa District Hospital) satisfaction level was moderate (70%) but at Mwananyamala Referral Hospital, satisfaction level was found to be low (<50%) [6][7][8]. If patient's level of satisfaction on quality of care does not meet their standards, patients may decide to seek treatment somewhere else out of the formal health system that may lead to poor health seeking behaviors resulting in poor initial uptake of services, poor adherence, poor retention of services and at the end this may contribute to high morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous study in Zambia also found no association of perceived quality of care and use of health professionals for childbirth [17]. A possible explanation is that measurement of perceived quality of health care in low income countries is subject to social desirability bias as respondents tend to give a more favourable response [59]. However, studies in Guinea and India showed high reliability for components of health personnel attitudes for the measure of quality of health care [60-62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of this study could include measurement bias regarding perceived quality of care, distance and cost. It is possible that some participants could over-rate the services because they fail to openly criticize the system [59,60]. However, perceptions give the user’s perspectives of health system functioning and provides opportunities for improvement of service provision [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated the size needed to detect a 17% reduction in waiting time from 114 minutes (SD 66) [24] to 95 minutes, with a k value of 0.25, 80% power and a significance level at of 5% (two tailed test). We did not increase the sample size to account for non-response because response rates of 100% were observed in previous studies in Tanzania [25,26]. The estimated sample size was 10 exit interviews per facility, equivalent to a total of 750 interviews in intervention and control areas respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%