Users’ Experiences with the Use of Transaction Data to Estimate Consumption-Based Emissions in a Carbon Calculator

Abstract

With global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ever increasing, we are currently seeing a renewed interest in carbon footprint calculators (or carbon calculators for short). While carbon calculators have traditionally calculated emissions based on user input about e.g., food, heating, and traveling, a new development in this area is the use of transaction data to also estimate emissions based on consumption. Such carbon calculators should be able to provide users with more accurate estimations, easier input possibilities, and an incentive to continue using them. In this paper, we present the results from a survey sent to the users of such a novel carbon calculator, called Svalna. Svalna offers users the possibility to connect their bank account. The transaction data are then coupled with Environmental Extended Multi Regional Input Output data (EE-MRIO) for Swedish conditions which are used to determine a continuous overview of the user’s greenhouse gas emissions from consumption. The aim of the survey was to (a) understand whether people are willing to connect their bank account, (b) whether they trust the calculations of their emissions, and (c) whether they think the use of Svalna has an effect on their behaviour. Furthermore, we wanted to know how Svalna could be improved. While the results of the survey showed that many users were willing to connect their bank account, a rather large part of the users perceived safety risks in doing so. The users also showed an only average level of trust in the correctness of the estimated greenhouse gas emissions. A lack of trust was attributed to experiencing technical problems but also to not knowing how the emissions were calculated and because the calculator could not capture all details of the user’s life. However, many users still indicated that the use of Svalna had helped them to initiate action to reduce their emissions. In order to improve Svalna, the users wanted to be able to provide more details, e.g., by scanning receipts and get better options for dealing with a shared economy. We conclude this paper by discussing some opportunities and challenges for the use of transaction data in carbon footprint calculators.

Climate neutrality through economic growth, digitalisation, eco-innovation and renewable energy in European countries

“…The authors point out that these dimensions are strongly correlated and can be reduced to two main components (connectivity and human capital), of which the use of the Internet shows causality with both independent dimensions. Barendregt et al (2020) studied the behaviour of online banking consumers in Sweden and the possibility of raising awareness about the impact of their behaviour on reducing GHG emissions. In this regard, many users are willing to connect their bank account to the online service provided by the mobile phone, even if some users perceived a high level of security risk.…”

“…Barendregt et al . (2020) studied the behaviour of online banking consumers in Sweden and the possibility of raising awareness about the impact of their behaviour on reducing GHG emissions.…”

Explainable Automatic Industrial Carbon Footprint Estimation From Bank Transaction Classification Using Natural Language Processing

“…These protocols are time consuming and expensive to apply at the industrial level. More recent solutions oriented to end users have performed automatic CF estimation from bank transactions [12] and employed social networking [40] to foster user engagement [41].…”

Carbon Footprint in Vegeburger Production Technology Using a Prototype Forming and Breading Device

“…The carbon footprint of agricultural products is the main indicator for monitoring the efficiency and sustainability of the production processes in agriculture, or more broadly in the agri-food industry [16,17]. The use of CF calculators when assessing the environmental impact of food products [18] is becoming popular, which also influences their positive perception by consumers [19]. Borsato et al [20] presented the carbon footprint values for selected vegetables, where according to these data, cauliflower and broccoli had a CF value of 0.30 kg CO 2-e /kg, carrots 0.15 kg CO 2-e /kg and onions 0.10 kg CO 2-e /kg.…”