2015
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2015-06449-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

𝐿²-Betti numbers of locally compact groups and their cross section equivalence relations

Abstract: We prove that the L 2 -Betti numbers of a unimodular locally compact group G coincide, up to a natural scaling constant, with the L 2 -Betti numbers of the countable equivalence relation induced on a cross section of any essentially free ergodic probability measure preserving action of G. As a consequence, we obtain that the reduced and un-reduced L 2 -Betti numbers of G agree and that the L 2 -Betti numbers of a lattice Γ in G equal those of G up to scaling by the covolume of Γ in G. We also deduce several va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any reasonable definition of cost for non-discrete locally compact groups would thus only provide three distinct orbit equivalence classes: the ones with a corresponding R Γ of cost 1, the ones with R Γ of finite cost greater than 1, and the ones with R Γ of infinite cost. This mirrors the first L 2 Betti number of locally compact unimodular groups, see [Pet13] and [KPV15].…”
Section: Weak Orbit Equivalence Versus Orbit Equivalencesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Any reasonable definition of cost for non-discrete locally compact groups would thus only provide three distinct orbit equivalence classes: the ones with a corresponding R Γ of cost 1, the ones with R Γ of finite cost greater than 1, and the ones with R Γ of infinite cost. This mirrors the first L 2 Betti number of locally compact unimodular groups, see [Pet13] and [KPV15].…”
Section: Weak Orbit Equivalence Versus Orbit Equivalencesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Proof. In this proof we will use the notations and conventions of Proposition 4.3 of [KPV15]. Let Y ⊂ X be a cross section and let U ⊂ G be a neighborhood of the identity as in Definition 1.14.…”
Section: Cross-sections and Product Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from [KPV13,Proposition 3.1] that this definition coincides with Gaboriau's definition of L 2 -Betti numbers, [G01].…”
Section: Cohomology Of Cartan Subalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here, we use Lück's dimension function for arbitrary modules over a von Neumann algebra with a semifinite trace, see [L02,Section 6.1] and [KPV13,Section A.4]. …”
Section: Cohomology Of Quasi-regular Inclusions Of Von Neumann Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence Γ ′ cannot be a lattice in a product of two non-compact lcsc groups. That is because β (2) 1 (Γ ′ ) > 0 implies that the first ℓ 2 -Betti number of any lattice envelope of Γ ′ is positive [42,Theorem B], and the first ℓ 2 -Betti number of a product of two non-compact unimodular lcsc groups is zero [54, Theorem 6.5 on p. 61]. This excludes that Γ ′ < G ′ is an Sarithmetic lattice as in Setup 4.1, so type (2) is ruled out.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem Dmentioning
confidence: 99%