2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842006000200016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zooplankton biomass of reservoirs in different trophic conditions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract: This paper reports on a study involving an estimate of the biomass of rotifers, cladocerans, and cyclopoid and calanoid copepods found in reservoirs in different trophic conditions, comparing and relating numerical density data and pointing out differences between the dry and rainy seasons. In terms of numerical densities, both reservoirs were dominated by rotifers, although cladocerans represented a higher biomass in the oligotrophic environment in both seasons. In the eutrophic environment, higher biomass va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
57
0
17

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(23 reference statements)
11
57
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative numbers and biomass of Calanoids decreased and those of Cyclopoids increased at sites under more eutrophic conditions, thus resulting in lower values of Calanoida-Cyclopoida ratios. This pattern has been reported before for other Brazilian reservoirs (Tundisi 1988, Santos-Wisniewski & Rocha 2007, Sendacz et al 2006) and elsewhere for both, tropical, and subtropical water bodies (Pace 1986, Caramujo & Boavida 2000, namely that the presence of calanoid copepods relates to a low trophic level in the habitat, while cyclopoid copepods are favored in the more productive areas of higher trophic state. The higher proportion of calanoids in oligotrophic waters is due to the herbivorous-filter feeding habit of most species belonging to this group, especially in adulthood; and such feeding is based on nano-phytoplankton, which is replaced by micro-phytoplankton in environments of higher trophic state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Relative numbers and biomass of Calanoids decreased and those of Cyclopoids increased at sites under more eutrophic conditions, thus resulting in lower values of Calanoida-Cyclopoida ratios. This pattern has been reported before for other Brazilian reservoirs (Tundisi 1988, Santos-Wisniewski & Rocha 2007, Sendacz et al 2006) and elsewhere for both, tropical, and subtropical water bodies (Pace 1986, Caramujo & Boavida 2000, namely that the presence of calanoid copepods relates to a low trophic level in the habitat, while cyclopoid copepods are favored in the more productive areas of higher trophic state. The higher proportion of calanoids in oligotrophic waters is due to the herbivorous-filter feeding habit of most species belonging to this group, especially in adulthood; and such feeding is based on nano-phytoplankton, which is replaced by micro-phytoplankton in environments of higher trophic state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The only site at which a high density of zooplankton was found was near the entrance of the Jaguari river, probably reflecting the higher trophic conditions suggested by the high phosphorus and chlorophyll concentrations (TSI value = 69). The fall in zooplankton at the end of the rainy season has also been observed in other reservoirs, as in the Guarapiranga reservoir, by Sendacz et al (2006), and the Barra Bonita reservoir, by Tundisi et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They are generally present in great numbers and with high species richness in tropical zooplankton, being opportunistic organisms capable of colonizing a wide variety of habitats, from temporarily flooded areas (Koste & Robertson 1990, Lima et al 1996, Garcia et al 1998, Martínez et al 2000, LansacTôha et al 2009) to large rivers, lakes and reservoirs (Oliveira Neto & Moreno 1999, Aoyagui & Bonecker. 2004, Sendacz et al 2006, Corgosinho & Pinto-Coelho, 2006, Almeida et al 2009, Borges & Pedrozo, 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%