2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zircon grain selection reveals (de)coupled metamictization, radiation damage, and He diffusivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding sources of intrasample dispersion in grain cooling ages is important for evaluating uncertainties in thermochronometric interpretations and optimizing sampling design. Most samples in this study displayed greater dispersion in ZHe grain ages (typical 1σ ~10% of mean age) than expected for analytical uncertainty (~4% of grain age), similar to results of other studies (e.g., Wolfe & Stockli, ; Guenthner et al, ; Powell et al, ; Ault et al, ), partly related to varying radiation damage that affects He diffusion (Guenthner et al, ). Grains were selected for ZHe analysis based on similar eU contents (mostly 30 to 300 ppm) and U‐Pb ages (mostly 2.0–1.0 Ga), and thus similar values of maximum accumulated radiation damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Understanding sources of intrasample dispersion in grain cooling ages is important for evaluating uncertainties in thermochronometric interpretations and optimizing sampling design. Most samples in this study displayed greater dispersion in ZHe grain ages (typical 1σ ~10% of mean age) than expected for analytical uncertainty (~4% of grain age), similar to results of other studies (e.g., Wolfe & Stockli, ; Guenthner et al, ; Powell et al, ; Ault et al, ), partly related to varying radiation damage that affects He diffusion (Guenthner et al, ). Grains were selected for ZHe analysis based on similar eU contents (mostly 30 to 300 ppm) and U‐Pb ages (mostly 2.0–1.0 Ga), and thus similar values of maximum accumulated radiation damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recent work extends the low-temperature thermal history of cratonic North American into deeper geologic time (Figures 8a and 8c; Ault et al, 2018;DeLucia et al, 2018;McDannell, Zeitler, & Schneider, 2018;Orme et al, 2016). For example, zircon He thermochronometry date-eU patterns from the North American midcontinent cratonic basement reveal~850-to 680-Ma cooling and exhumation associated with the development of the Great Unconformity, an erosion surface representing~100-1,000 Ma of missing geologic time between Precambrian and Phanerozoic rocks (DeLucia et al, 2018).…”
Section: 1029/2018tc005312mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Zircon He dates can yield positive and/or negative relationships with eU and increasing visual metamictization (see zircon images) tracks with increased eU . Young, uniform zircon He dates at high eU (and thus high radiation damage) define a date-eU "pediment," reflecting residence at temperatures low enough to accumulate sufficient damage to yield low closure temperatures combined with subsequent heating followed by relatively rapid cooling across a range of closure temperature (T c )-equivalent to apatite fission track and apatite He T c (e.g., Ault et al, 2018;DeLucia et al, 2018;Johnson et al, 2017;Mackintosh et al, 2017). High eU zircon He dates can be younger than apatite He dates reflecting low T c .…”
Section: Radiation Damage and Chemistry Controls On (U-th)/he And Ft mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Radiation damage effects expand the effective T c range of apatite and zircon He systems and can be exploited to better constrain thermal histories (e.g., Ault et al, ; Flowers, ; Guenthner et al, ; Orme et al, ). Available radiation damage‐diffusivity models for apatite and zircon assume damage annealing occurs at the temperatures and rates that FTs anneal in each system, although recent work suggests that α‐damage annealing may require higher temperatures (Ault et al, ; Flowers, ; Fox & Shuster, ; Gautheron et al, ; Gerin et al, ; Ginster et al, ; Guenthner et al, ; Willett et al, ). In addition to radiation damage effects, possible sources of overdispersion in He dates include strong eU zonation and associated errors in correcting for grain edge α ejection, parentless He implanted by “bad neighbors” or hosted in unrecognized U‐Th‐rich inclusions, and crystal defects that create fast diffusion pathways (e.g., Farley, ; Flowers & Kelley, ).…”
Section: Low‐temperature Thermochronometry and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%