2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2016.1169440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero dynamics stabilisation and adaptive trajectory tracking for WIP vehicles through feedback linearisation and LQR technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the following control synthesis of TWIP in 3D, the whole dynamics is decoupled into two independent sub-system, the longitudinal system and rotational system, the approach of which has been used by Grasser et al (2002), Lin et al (2011) and Yue et al (2016).…”
Section: Control Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the following control synthesis of TWIP in 3D, the whole dynamics is decoupled into two independent sub-system, the longitudinal system and rotational system, the approach of which has been used by Grasser et al (2002), Lin et al (2011) and Yue et al (2016).…”
Section: Control Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve equation ( 42), the QP method is exploited to obtain the optimal control torque for rotational motion, which has been used by Yue et al (2016) and Li et al (2016).…”
Section: Rotational Motion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. This robot has been widely used as a test bed for nonlinear controls of UMSs, such as [11], [41]- [43]. In this paper, in order to highlight the characteristic of underactuation of the TWSBR and simplify the operation, we simplify the robot to a two-dimensional plane as shown in FIGURE.…”
Section: An Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, complex internal dynamics, lack of feedback linearization and nonholonomic behavior also accompany UMSs, which increase the difficulty of designing controller for such systems. Even so, many brilliant work for such systems have been achieved in control field, such as sliding-mode [8]- [10], LQR [11], partial feedback linearization [12], [13], LMI [14], [15], H ∞ [16] and so on. However, most of the control methods mentioned above are difficult to deal with nonholonomic servo constraints [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system describing these "internal" behaviors can be defined as zero dynamics (Isidori, 1995;Khalil, 2001). The stability performance for the zero dynamics is a key part to ensure the effectiveness of the controller (Hernandez, Castanos, & Fridmana, 2016;Nguyen, Ha, & Lee, 2015;Yue, An, & Sun, 2016). A new type of stability performances called as partially input-to-state stable, is given to solve the stability problem of the zero dynamics of the underactuated multibody systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%