2008
DOI: 10.1080/07418820802025181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth Behavior, School Structure, and Student Risk of Victimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
103
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
6
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Without blaming these victims, this approach seeks to identify preventable risk factors or correlates of victimization. A number of studies, for instance, have found that students who associate with delinquent friends and engage in delinquent activities themselves experience elevated risks of school victimization (Burrow & Apel, 2008;Campbell Augustine et al, 2002;George & Thomas, 2000;Ousey, Wilcox, & Brummel, 2008;Schreck et al, 2003;Wilcox, May, & Roberts, 2006). Such findings have been interpreted as consistent with opportunity theory -greater exposure to motivated offenders, as indicated by peer delinquency and one's own delinquency, produces opportunity for victimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Without blaming these victims, this approach seeks to identify preventable risk factors or correlates of victimization. A number of studies, for instance, have found that students who associate with delinquent friends and engage in delinquent activities themselves experience elevated risks of school victimization (Burrow & Apel, 2008;Campbell Augustine et al, 2002;George & Thomas, 2000;Ousey, Wilcox, & Brummel, 2008;Schreck et al, 2003;Wilcox, May, & Roberts, 2006). Such findings have been interpreted as consistent with opportunity theory -greater exposure to motivated offenders, as indicated by peer delinquency and one's own delinquency, produces opportunity for victimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In summary, there is a relatively small body of research providing somewhat conflicting evidence regarding the overall effects of visible security measures on adolescents' academic outcomes. Indeed, most empirical studies have focused on the effects of visible security measures on adolescents' delinquency or victimization outcomes (e.g., Burrow andApel 2008 Jackson 2002;Theriot 2009), with no examination of a crucial indicator of adolescent well-being-namely, success in school.…”
Section: Prior Research On the Academic Consequences Of Visible Schoomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these findings are generally positive, victimization is occurring at a higher rate within schools as opposed to away from school (Dinkes et aI., 2010;Mayer & Furlong, 2010). This finding is particularly troublesome for educators, principles, and school staff who are charged with ensuring a safe learning environment for students because it is their responsibility to ensure a safe and orderly learning environment (Bowen & Bowen, 1999;Burrow & Apel, 2008;Farrington & Ttofi, 2009) and it places them in a location that can lead to their own victimization (Dinkes et aI., 2010).…”
Section: Statement Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 85%