2014
DOI: 10.1177/0734282913515442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young Children’s Analogical Reasoning

Abstract: In this study, a computerized measure, Interactive Analogical Measure (IAM), was developed and used to assess young children’s ability to reason analogically. The IAM was equipped to provide corrective feedback and the effects of that feedback were tested for experimental and control groups. A group of 5-year-olds (N = 80) participated in the study. Children were randomly assigned to the experimental or control group and the IAM was similarly implemented with the exception of the feedback indicators. There wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, significant gaps in theory and research on the course of relational reasoning development remain. With regard to onset, for instance, there is evidence that even children as young as four can manifest relational reasoning when the conditions and contexts are facilitative (White and Alexander, 1986;Chiu and Alexander, 2014). Those facilitative conditions include familiarity with the content or task, scaffolding or feedback from a teacher or more knowledgeable other, and a task environment that is interesting and motivating (Marzolf et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, significant gaps in theory and research on the course of relational reasoning development remain. With regard to onset, for instance, there is evidence that even children as young as four can manifest relational reasoning when the conditions and contexts are facilitative (White and Alexander, 1986;Chiu and Alexander, 2014). Those facilitative conditions include familiarity with the content or task, scaffolding or feedback from a teacher or more knowledgeable other, and a task environment that is interesting and motivating (Marzolf et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%