Young Children Infer Causal Strength From Probabilities and Interventions

Abstract

We examine the interaction of two cues that children use to make judgments about cause-effect relations: probabilities and interventions. Children were shown a “detector” that lit up and played music when a block was placed on its surface. We varied the probabilistic effectiveness of the block, as well as whether the experimenter or the child was performing the interventions. In Experiment 1, we found that children can use probabilistic evidence to make inferences about causal strength. However, when the results of their own interventions are in conflict with the overall frequencies, preschoolers favor the results of their own interventions. In Experiment 2, children used probabilistic evidence to infer a hidden causal mechanism. Though they again gave preference to their own interventions, they did not do so when their interventions were explicitly confounded by an alternative cause.

Rethinking natural altruism: Simple reciprocal interactions trigger children’s benevolence

“…More generally, and consistent with research that shows that children are avid learners who eagerly look for clues about how the physical world operates (34,35), our data build on theories of children's social learning (36,37) by documenting that reciprocal interactions trigger the enactment and expectation of altruism in young children. That is, after an experience with reciprocity, children seem to construct a community characterized by care and commitment.…”

The origins of inquiry: inductive inference and exploration in early childhood

“…Control conditions established that children's inferences depend on the probability of the outcome given the intervention, not the frequency of the outcome or the number of failed interventions [4]. Several studies have since replicated this finding, showing that across a range of tasks, ages, and content domains, children use the conditional probability of events to make causal judgments ( [5][6][7][8][9]; see [10] for review).…”

Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play

“…Studies suggest, for instance, that preschoolers understand patterns of co-variation well enough to distinguish genuine causes from spurious associations: if two variables together generate an effect but only one variable generates the effect independently, children conclude that the other variable is not a cause (Gopnik, Sobel, Schulz & Glymour, 2001;Kushnir & Gopnik, 2005; 2007; ). Children's causal judgments are also sensitive to the base rate of candidate causes.…”