2018
DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2018.1437462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘You get some very archaic ideas of what teaching is … ’: primary school teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to physically active lessons

Abstract: Physically active lessons present a key paradigm shift in educational practice. However, little is known about the barriers to implementing physically active lessons. To address this, practising primary teachers (23=female) from nine primary schools across West Yorkshire, England, were engaged in focus group interviews. Drawing on the socio-ecological model, findings revealed that barriers influencing the implementation of physically active lessons are multifaceted. Teacher's confidence and competence, concern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(56 reference statements)
5
44
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we found statistically significant improvements in LPA at the group level, the standard universal approach masked behavioural differences between subgroups and incorrectly presumed all participants reacted in the same way to the intervention (26,29). Refined analysis revealed small, but varied responses to the intervention: first, the least active pupils benefitted most, an effect supported by previous literature (39). Second, both intervention subgroups revealed a significant increase in time spent in LPA (p<0.05), "A pedometer-based physically active learning intervention: The importance of using pre-intervention physical activity categories to assess effectiveness" by Morris JL et al…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we found statistically significant improvements in LPA at the group level, the standard universal approach masked behavioural differences between subgroups and incorrectly presumed all participants reacted in the same way to the intervention (26,29). Refined analysis revealed small, but varied responses to the intervention: first, the least active pupils benefitted most, an effect supported by previous literature (39). Second, both intervention subgroups revealed a significant increase in time spent in LPA (p<0.05), "A pedometer-based physically active learning intervention: The importance of using pre-intervention physical activity categories to assess effectiveness" by Morris JL et al…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The present study, in part, aims to encourage schools and policymakers to address the issue of traditional didactic teaching methods promoting sedentary behaviour and limiting time to be physically active (39). Moreover, it also endorses deploying analyses that can illustrate variations in intervention effect when the intervention occurs in a confined classroom space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The social environment reflects the degree to which the stakeholders engage and support each other to provide physical activity. For example, teachers who implement physically active learning within supportive school social environments experience fewer implementation barriers [38][39][40].…”
Section: The Social and Physical Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An undesirable consequence of this approach is that whilst children may be sufficiently active during physical education classes, the opportunity for children to develop their motor skills may be overlooked, thus potentially reducing their ability to maintain physical activity when leaving school and transitioning into adulthood [ 5 ]. Additionally, in a primary school setting, physical education is often not delivered by teachers with specialist physical education teacher training as recommended [ 16 ] and a lack of teachers’ confidence in delivering physical activity sessions has been reported by Ofsted [ 17 ] and in previous research [ 18 ]. This lack of confidence may prevent teachers from delivering activities that require specialist coaching and instruction, such as fundamental movement skills [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%