2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield locus evolution and constitutive parameter identification using plane strain tension and tensile tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By means of finite element simulations, the behaviour of the material was adjusted following an experimentally known response. This approach has been successfully used for the determination of the tensile behaviour beyond the necking point [24] or the yield loci calibration [25].…”
Section: Procedures Based On the Inverse Modelling Methods Of The Com...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of finite element simulations, the behaviour of the material was adjusted following an experimentally known response. This approach has been successfully used for the determination of the tensile behaviour beyond the necking point [24] or the yield loci calibration [25].…”
Section: Procedures Based On the Inverse Modelling Methods Of The Com...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular approach for parameter identification is finite element method updated (FEMU), using iterative finite element analysis within an inverse analysis [11][12][13][14][15]. The method uses the discrepancy between numerical results and experimentally determined loads and strain fields to define an objective function.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, inverse analysis with iterative FEA was used by Güner et al [11] to identify the yield function parameters of Yld2000-2d [5] using the FE-code Abaqus-Explicit and the Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm. In a subsequent study of Aydın et al [12], a parameter identification for the evolution of the yield surface Yld2000-2d [5] was performed using the optimisation tool Ls-Opt and the FE-code Ls-Dyna with experimental data of standard tensile tests and a plane strain tension test. Further studies calibrate the yield surface on experiments designed for the validation of specific forming conditions in order to get a processoriented material response.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for instance, to calibrate CB2001 yield criterion, in case of plane stress state, the necessary conventional input data includes 7 r-values and 7 uniaxial yield stresses [39]. Furthermore, for accurate identification procedure of advanced yield functions [34,40,41], the required set of experimental input data includes, besides the seven uniaxial yield stresses and r-values, the equibiaxial yield stress b  , equibiaxial strain ratio r b -value, and plane strain stresses [42,43], among others, such as biaxial stresses acquired from free expansion bulged tubes, which are needed for accurate calibration of constitutive models applied to simulate tube hydroforming process [44]. Nevertheless, the type of nonstandard experimental tests are usually not available in industrial or research laboratories, besides, it is uneconomical task to carry out a large number of costly mechanical tests.…”
Section: Artificial Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%