2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield benefit and underlying cost of insect-resistance transgenic rice: Implication in breeding and deploying transgenic crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous evaluation of the same Bt GE rice lines did not show any yield losses caused by the underlying fitness cost under different experimental designs (Huang et al 2008;Wang et al 2010). The above findings are not in accordance with reports from other studies in which some insect-resistant Bt GE rice lines showed various degrees of yield loss when ambient insect pressure was extremely low (Chen et al 2006;Kim et al 2008;Xia et al 2010), probably reflecting the underlying cost of the transgene(s). The discrepancy between these results clearly demonstrates a case-specific situation concerning the benefit and cost of different transgenes and transgenic events that influence the performances of GE crops.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous evaluation of the same Bt GE rice lines did not show any yield losses caused by the underlying fitness cost under different experimental designs (Huang et al 2008;Wang et al 2010). The above findings are not in accordance with reports from other studies in which some insect-resistant Bt GE rice lines showed various degrees of yield loss when ambient insect pressure was extremely low (Chen et al 2006;Kim et al 2008;Xia et al 2010), probably reflecting the underlying cost of the transgene(s). The discrepancy between these results clearly demonstrates a case-specific situation concerning the benefit and cost of different transgenes and transgenic events that influence the performances of GE crops.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Previous studies have indicated that many insect-resistant GE rice lines can have significant yield benefits under insect attacks (Tu et al 2000;Chen et al 2006;Huang et al 2008;Wang et al 2010), in addition to their positive impacts on agricultural ecosystems and more environmentally friendly farming practices (Huang et al 2005(Huang et al , 2008. However, studies have also indicated the underlying fitness cost of some insect-resistant GE rice lines under insect-free or low-insect environmental conditions (Chen et al 2006;Kim et al 2008;Xia et al 2010), which might potentially lead to some degree of yield loss when ambient insect pests are scarce. In addition, it is also important to detect effects on yield of an insect-resistant GE crop caused by target and non-target insects in a well-designed field experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moderate yield reduction (5%) has been observed in genetically modified herbicide-resistant crops (Elmore et al, 2001) without hampering their widespread use. Many fitness costs linked to diverse traits in genetically modified crops have been reported, but they could be because of overexpression, silencing or breakage of native genes (Xia et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other genes such as spider venom, agglutinin, snow drop lectin (GNA) have been used to confer resistance to leaf folder, striped stem borer, aphids and rice brown planthopper respectively (Qiu et al 2001;Khan et al 2006;Ye et al 2009a, b;Xiaofen et al 2001). Some reports provide detailed accounts on the economic, environmental and health benefits of various insect-resistant transgenic crops (James 2005;Ferry et al 2006;Rahman et al 2007;Gatehouse, 2008;Xia et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%