1932
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1932.01450030253004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xeroderma Pigmentosum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

1934
1934
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of our patients who had features of both DDD and KAR suggested to us the possibility that these two conditions might be variants of one disease , Although the sites of pigmentation are different, DDD being localized mainly to the flexures and KAR to the extensor surfaces of the hands and feet, the histology is very similar. KAR lacks only the antler-like pattern of the epithelial proliferation which, incidentally, is not a constant feature even in DDD, The five cases described by Becker & Reuter (1939) as familial pigmentary anomaly and the case of Montgomery & Reuter (1932) of xeroderma pigmentosum, later repudiated as such (Becker & Reuter, 1939), were probably genuine cases of this DDD-KAR association. Both of them had reticulate pigmentation of the neck and forearms with a histopathology which was strikingly similar to KAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One of our patients who had features of both DDD and KAR suggested to us the possibility that these two conditions might be variants of one disease , Although the sites of pigmentation are different, DDD being localized mainly to the flexures and KAR to the extensor surfaces of the hands and feet, the histology is very similar. KAR lacks only the antler-like pattern of the epithelial proliferation which, incidentally, is not a constant feature even in DDD, The five cases described by Becker & Reuter (1939) as familial pigmentary anomaly and the case of Montgomery & Reuter (1932) of xeroderma pigmentosum, later repudiated as such (Becker & Reuter, 1939), were probably genuine cases of this DDD-KAR association. Both of them had reticulate pigmentation of the neck and forearms with a histopathology which was strikingly similar to KAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Выраженность гиперкератоза и пигментации усиливается в стадии гиперпигментации и атрофии кожи. По мере прогрессирования заболевания отмечается атрофия эпидермиса в одних участках и утолщение в других, нарушение стратификации кератиноцитов, гиперхромазия ядер, появление элементов с признаками цитологической атипии -гистологическая картина напоминает актинический кератоз [26]. В дерме визуализируются дистрофические изменения, сходные с таковыми при актиническом дерматите, характеризующиеся базофилией коллагеновых волокон и солярным эластозом.…”
Section: гистологическая картинаunclassified
“…Die lokale und systemische Anwendung von Retinoiden führte nicht zum gewünschten Erfolg [25,44,45]. Klinische Überlappungsformen, wie auch bei der hier vorgestellten Patientin, die neben den klinischen Merkmalen eines Morbus Dowling-Degos zusätzlich die für den Morbus Kitamura typische Hyperpigmentierung der Handrücken aufweist, sind in der Literatur mehrfach beschrieben worden und lassen sich in dieses Spektrum leicht einfügen [3, 5, 6, 9-12, 16,18,31,32,43,46,49]. Die Pigmentatio reticularis faciei et colli mit epithelialer Zystomatose und die familiär auftretenden multiplen follikulären Harmartome bilden mit den stark ausgeprägten follikulären und zystischen Läsionen das andere Ende des Spektrums (Tabelle 1).…”
Section: Literaturunclassified