2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray spectra of XMM-Newton serendipitous medium flux sources

Abstract: Abstract. We report on the results of a detailed analysis of the X-ray spectral properties of a large sample of sources detected serendipitously with the XMM-Newton observatory in 25 selected fields, for which optical identification is in progress. The survey covers a total solid angle of ∼3.5 deg 2 and contains 1137 sources with ∼10 −15 < S 0.5−10 < 10 −12 erg cm −2 s −1 with good enough spectral quality as to perform a detailed X-ray spectral analysis of each individual object. We find evidence for hardening… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
98
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
11
98
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is much harder than the typical intrinsic photon indices ( ∼ 1.9) seen in AGN X-ray spectra (cf. Nandra et al 1997;Mateos et al 2005;Piconcelli et al 2005) and is suggestive of heavy obscuration. Fitting the same model to the data from each mission separately, the observed 2-10 keV fluxes span the range of F 2-10 ≈ (7-14) × 10 −13 erg s −1 cm −2 between the missions (with the harder Swift photon index giving the highest flux), and are fully consistent with each other at 90 per cent confidence.…”
Section: Basic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is much harder than the typical intrinsic photon indices ( ∼ 1.9) seen in AGN X-ray spectra (cf. Nandra et al 1997;Mateos et al 2005;Piconcelli et al 2005) and is suggestive of heavy obscuration. Fitting the same model to the data from each mission separately, the observed 2-10 keV fluxes span the range of F 2-10 ≈ (7-14) × 10 −13 erg s −1 cm −2 between the missions (with the harder Swift photon index giving the highest flux), and are fully consistent with each other at 90 per cent confidence.…”
Section: Basic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be done by calculating the intrinsic (before absorption) luminosity and absorption (N H ) function in order to obtain results free from selection effects. Since hard X-ray photons are less affected by absorption, absorbed AGN are more likely to be detected at energies above 2 keV and hence we have applied such method to the hard (2−10 keV) and ultrahard (4.5−7.5 keV) sources, for which we have detailed spectral data (photon index Γ and intrinsic absorbing column densities N H , Mateos et al 2005). With ∼25% of the XMS sources in the hard and ultrahard bands classified as type-2 AGN, we find that they typically log N H > 22, a value commonly used to separate absorbed AGN from the unabsorbed ones (see Fig.…”
Section: The N H Function Of Hard Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excess X-ray absorption above the Galactic value and a soft excess emission were detected in ∼4% and ∼9% of the sources respectivelly. We used the recipe in Mateos et al (2005a) to obtain the intrinsic fraction of objects with detected soft excess and/or intrinsic absorption. The method takes into account the expected number of spurious detections (1% expected for the chosen F-test significance threshold) using Bayesian statistics.…”
Section: Spectral Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors claim an anti-correlation between the spectral photon index Γ and the X-ray luminosity (Young et al 2009;Saez et al 2008;Page et al 2005) while other studies suggest the opposite correlation (Dai et al 2004) or no correlation at all (Winter et al 2009;Mateos et al 2005b;George et al 2000;Reeves & Turner 2000). Studies of the X-ray spectra of AGN have generally shown no clear dependence of the AGN X-ray properties on the redshift (Mateos et al 2005a), although some exceptions have been found (Kelly et al 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%