1954
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(54)90194-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray measurement of order in CuAu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
3

Year Published

1958
1958
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the long-range ordering degree of the fct phase for the as-synthesized NPs in more detail, the order parameter S is employed. An approximate relation between S and c/a can be written as follows: 33 where is (c/a)Sf the axial ratio for the fully ordered phase, c/a ratio is for the partially ordered phase. S = 1 in this equation corresponds to the fully ordered phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the long-range ordering degree of the fct phase for the as-synthesized NPs in more detail, the order parameter S is employed. An approximate relation between S and c/a can be written as follows: 33 where is (c/a)Sf the axial ratio for the fully ordered phase, c/a ratio is for the partially ordered phase. S = 1 in this equation corresponds to the fully ordered phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better analogy might be found in the intragroup compounds CuAu and NiPt that display ordering transitions at moderate temperatures (681 K and 898 K, respectively). 57,58 CuAu would have an ionicity of r σ = 0.21 in the St. John-Bloch plot, but it has such low covalency (r −1 π = 0.43) that it does not appear in the same frame as IV-VI compounds. Meanwhile the strongly covalent intragroup IV-IV compound SiC (r −1 π = 3.1) forms a refractory, tetrahedrallycoordinated diamond lattice.…”
Section: B Crystal Chemistry and High-temperature Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nous remarquerons que la courbe relative ~t AuCu est tr~s diff6rente de celle que propose Roberts (1954). En effet cet auteur attribue encore ~t S la valeur 0,97 au voisinage de la temp6rature de transition I -+ II alors que nous avons mesur6 S=0,80 ~t 376°C.…”
Section: Techniques Exp6rlmentalesunclassified
“…L'enthalpie de formation de cet alliage est de -2145 cal/atome g h 160°C (S= 1), elle n'est plus que -1950 cal/atome g g 375,5°C et environ 1320 cal/atome g en phase c~ ~t 419°C (Hertz, 1967a). L'6nergie raise en jeu au cours de la mise en d6sordre est donc de l'ordre de 800 cal/atome g dont 200 correspondent h la mise en d6sordre partiel de la phase I. I1 apparait que la variation corr61ative de 20% du degr6 d'ordre que nous proposons rend mieux compte de la variation de l'enthalpie que celle de Roberts (1954) qui n'est que 3%. Nous pensons qu'une trempe trop lente de ces alliages a conduit cet auteur/: ces valeurs trop 61ev6es.…”
Section: Techniques Exp6rlmentalesunclassified