Workplace Bullying, Anxiety, and Job Performance: Choosing Between “Passive Resistance” or “Swallowing the Insult”?

Abstract

Anxiety arising from workplace bullying is a key concern for job performance. Anxiety can explain the effects of workplace bullying: individuals may seek to deal with their anxiety by applying specific behaviors. However, anxiety research does not carefully distinguish between state anxiety and trait anxiety, and so the impact of anxiety in general has been seen as complex and contradictory. Individuals may respond to bullying and anxiety through "passive resistance" or by "swallowing the insult." However, under what circumstances do individuals choose between these options? This paper summarizes the mechanisms of state anxiety and trait anxiety and uses cognitive balance theory to measure loss of self-control and the strategic choices. A moderated mediation model is presented for the relationship between workplace bullying and job performance using key variables of state anxiety and trait anxiety. Employee-supervisor pairs from 20 organizations and institutions from Tianjin, Jiangsu, and Hainan participated in a twopoint longitudinal survey in 2019, 82.67% effective. Analysis verified that trait anxiety is the decisive perspective for choosing between "passive resistance" and "swallowing the insult." This provides theoretical and practical contributions to psychology and organizational behavior research.

Can Ethical Leadership Improve Employees’ Well-Being at Work? Another Side of Ethical Leadership Based on Organizational Citizenship Anxiety

“…In addition, employees with state anxiety tend to exhaust their energy and attention to worry about task-related issues and criticize their abilities ( Sarason, 1984 ). When such worry exceeds a certain level, it will hinder employees’ work satisfaction ( Boyd et al, 2009 ) and work motivation, so it is difficult for employees to improve their work performance ( Wu et al, 2020 ).…”

Influence of differential leadership behavior on employees’ deviant innovation: Based on dual perspectives of insider and outsider subordinates

“…In response to the treatment methods cited above, employees will form a self-role perception of insider subordinates or outsider subordinates , and form different inner states based on their respective roles, and continue to promote rational behavior choices. For a long time innovative behavior has been widely regarded as an inexhaustible driving force for organizational development, but enterprises have gradually discovered that in practice employee innovation behavior has begun to be tinged with deviance, and innovation activities and workplace deviance are potentially closely and interestingly related ( Criscuolo et al, 2015 ; Wu et al, 2020 ).…”

How can the subjective well-being of nurses be predicted? Understanding the mediating effect of psychological distress, psychological resilience and emotional exhaustion

“…, 2020; Wu et al. , 2020a, b). These features of the hospital setting create the incidence of work–family conflicts (WFCs) among employees (AlAzzam et al.…”