Work-Related Learning and Skill Development in Europe: Does Initial Skill Mismatch Matter?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. This paper provides more insight into the relevance of the assumption of human capital theory that the productivity of job-related training is driven by the improvement of workers' skills. We analyse the extent to which training and informal learning on the job are related to employee skill development and consider the heterogeneity of this relationship with respect to workers' skill mismatch at job entry. Using data from the 2014 European Skills Survey, we find -as assumed by human capital theory -that employees who participated in training or informal learning show greater improvement of their skills than those who did not. The contribution of informal learning to employee skill development appears to be larger than that of training participation. Nevertheless, both forms of learning are shown to be complementary. This complementarity between training and informal learning is related to a significant additional improvement of workers' skills. The skill development of workers who were initially underskilled for their job seems to benefit the most from both training and informal learning, whereas the skill development of those who were initially overskilled benefits the least. Work-related learning investments in the latter group seem to be more functional in offsetting skill depreciation than in fostering skill accumulation. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SJEL Classification: J24, M53

Employers' Willingness to Invest in the Training of Temporary Workers: A Discrete Choice Experiment

“…significantly between temporary workers with and those without such prospects (Ferreira, Künn, & De Grip, 2017;Fouarge et al, 2012).…”

Self-perfection or self-selection? Unraveling the relationship between job-related training and adults’ literacy skills

“…Albeit relatively coarse, these measures are valuable in that they allow respondents’ often highly idiosyncratic training activities to be assessed in a parsimonious fashion. Yet there are some indications from previous studies that not only participation in training per se but also the intensity of training determines its effects [23, 53]. In addition, there might be differences according to the specific type of training (e.g., whether or not courses take place during working hours) [54].…”

No Future, No Training? Explaining Cross-national Variation in the Effect of Job Tasks On Training Participation

“…Consequently, employees hired for such positions often do not possess all of the required skills and have to learn them through further training to become productive in their position. Thus, further training alleviates mismatches on the labor market due to underskilled workers (Ferreira et al 2017). The second argument is that some tasks demand skills that become outdated quickly.…”