2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.01758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Turbine Fault Detection Using Counter-Based Residual Thresholding

Abstract: This paper investigates application of model-based fault detection techniques on wind turbines. Fault residuals are generated through physically redundant sensors, parity equations and common filtering methods. Up-down counters are used for decisioning on these fault residuals. These simple counters are commonly used in the aerospace industry to improve missed detection rates. These techniques constitute an easily implementable fault detection and isolation system on an industrial turbine. The performance of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This benchmark has been used in an international competition on FDI and FTC in Wind Turbines aiming at finding the best schemes to diagnose and handle the different faults proposed. According to [12,13,14], the most promising solutions proposed are: Data-driven [15], Gaussian Kernel Support Vector Machine [16], Estimation [17], Up-Down Counters [18], Combined Observer and Kalman Filter [19], General Fault Model [20], Fuzzy Models [21], online identification [22] and Set-Membership/Virtual Sensors-Actuators [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This benchmark has been used in an international competition on FDI and FTC in Wind Turbines aiming at finding the best schemes to diagnose and handle the different faults proposed. According to [12,13,14], the most promising solutions proposed are: Data-driven [15], Gaussian Kernel Support Vector Machine [16], Estimation [17], Up-Down Counters [18], Combined Observer and Kalman Filter [19], General Fault Model [20], Fuzzy Models [21], online identification [22] and Set-Membership/Virtual Sensors-Actuators [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These residuals are obtained using both physical and analytical redundancy. The details of the solutions can be found in Ozdemir et al [2011].…”
Section: Up-down Counter Solution (Udc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper some of these proposed methods are compared both on test sequences defined in the benchmark, and in addition on a number additional test sets for testing robust of the proposed schemes to operational point of occurrence of the faults. The compared solutions can be seen in Chen et al [2011], Laouti et al [2011], Ozdemir et al [2011], Svard and Nyberg [2011] and Zhang et al [2011]. A number of other solutions have also been applied to this benchmark model, among these are: Ayalew and Pisu [2011], Blesa et al [2011], Dong and Verhaegen [2011], Kiasi et al [2011], Simani et al [2011a], Simani et al [2011b] and Stoican et al [2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third method relying on Up-Down Counters (UDC) was addressed in [17]. These tools, are commonly used in the aerospace framework, and they provide a different approach to the decision logic usually applied to the control.…”
Section: Performance Verification and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%