2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind dispersal of oribatid mites as a mode of migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, springtails were reported to be wind-dispersed more often than oribatid mites (Freeman 1952;Glick 1939;Gressitt et al 1961;Johnson 1957), which could explain their high species numbers at higher elevations and their more even distribution across elevation and ecological gradients. Although wind dispersal can also be relevant for oribatid mites (Lehmitz et al 2011), we trapped them only sporadically at the wind-exposed surface. In contrast, seventeen species of springtails were captured in the pitfall traps, nine of which also occurred in the soil (Supplemental Table S1c).…”
Section: Microarthropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, springtails were reported to be wind-dispersed more often than oribatid mites (Freeman 1952;Glick 1939;Gressitt et al 1961;Johnson 1957), which could explain their high species numbers at higher elevations and their more even distribution across elevation and ecological gradients. Although wind dispersal can also be relevant for oribatid mites (Lehmitz et al 2011), we trapped them only sporadically at the wind-exposed surface. In contrast, seventeen species of springtails were captured in the pitfall traps, nine of which also occurred in the soil (Supplemental Table S1c).…”
Section: Microarthropodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small body size, dorso-ventral flattening of the body, long hairs or setae, and in some cases the production of wax filaments [31][32][33], all serve to increase drag forces on the arthropod and to reduce the terminal velocity at which it falls. Many of the migrants carried away in updrafts will move distances of only a few metres, but some will travel much longer distances, e.g., [34]. Once again, we note that the take-off or launch phase involves specialized behaviours in response to specific environmental stimuli and is largely under the control of the individual (see below), so that even these diminutive arthropods usually enter the air-stream as part of an active migration syndrome, rather than being carried away accidentally.…”
Section: Windborne Migration Without the Use Of Silkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different groups of colonizers also differ in dispersal capacity. Oribatid mites are flightless and depend on passive dispersal (e.g., by wind; Lehmitz, Russell, Hohberg, Christian, & Xylander, , ) leading to low capacity to disperse to new hosts. Overall, low dispersal capacity combined with some moderate host specialization in oribatid mites might lead to increased immigration of distinct species across short spatial distances, from phylogenetically distant neighbours, through mass effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%