William of Malmesbury on Kingship

Abstract

Weiler, B. (2005). William of Malmesbury on Kingship. History. 90 (297), 3-22. RAE2008This article uses the historical works of William of Malmesbury to explore notions and concepts of kingship in Norman England. It argues, first, that his understanding of the royal office owes more to traditional, even patristic, concepts of secular power than historians have been willing to accept, and, secondly, that his concept of a ruler's duties was more concerned with issues of proper behaviour, symbolic actions and moral leadership than those aspects of Anglo-Norman kingship which modern scholars have traditionally explored.Peer reviewe

Bi̇r Zayif Yargisal Deneti̇m Yöntemi̇ Örneği̇ Olarak Kanada Haklar Ve Özgürlükler Beyannamesi̇’ni̇n 33. Maddesi̇’ni̇n (Askiya Alma Hükmü) Değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇

“…33. maddenin bu oldukça önemli kullanımı, temel hakları sınırlama girişimi değil de, siyasi bir karşı saldırı olarak görüldüğünden fazla dikkat çekmemiştir 116 . Quebec'de Parti Qubecouis iktidarı sırasında 33. maddenin mutat olarak her kanunda kullanılması, askıya alma yönteminin sadece belirli kanunlar için istisnai biçimde kullanılması sonucunda yaratacağı siyasi maliyeti de ortadan kaldırarak Beyanname'nin kurmuş olduğu sistemi alt üst etmiştir 117 .…”

Michel Beheim’s Von Den Türken und dem adel sagt dis: A demotic lament and crusading song contemporary with the fall of Constantinople in 1453

“…This means that Constantinople was conquered by a man who, while in a position of authority, had ruled despotically. A European consensus had already formed around the qualities of good governance in the 12th century (see Galbraith 1945 andWeiler 2005). Secular power articulated itself in a commonly accepted set of duties and behavioural norms.…”