2003
DOI: 10.1078/1617-1381-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife habitat analysis – a multidimensional habitat management model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hilltops and valley bottoms were covered with patchy forests and interspersed with pasture. The forests were managed and used intensively for various recreation activities, and were dominated by Norway spruce Picea abies (49%), European silver fir Abies alba (19%) and common beech Fagus sylvatica (22%; Suchant, Baritz & Braunisch 2003). The winter climate in the area is temperate with high precipitation (2000 mm year −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hilltops and valley bottoms were covered with patchy forests and interspersed with pasture. The forests were managed and used intensively for various recreation activities, and were dominated by Norway spruce Picea abies (49%), European silver fir Abies alba (19%) and common beech Fagus sylvatica (22%; Suchant, Baritz & Braunisch 2003). The winter climate in the area is temperate with high precipitation (2000 mm year −1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, as a typical Pannonian landscape with a high level of cultivation (Antonić and Beuković 2007), the Vojvodina region offers limited conditions for wildlife habitat (Suchant, Baritz and Braunisch 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is located on the most productive land, covering 30% of the earth's land area, and 80% in the Vojvodina region (Antonić and Beuković 2007). Consequently, the establishment of agriculture and hunting grounds could influence natural habitats (Knoche and Lupi 2004), with certain conflicts arising between wildlife management and protection on the one hand, and the utilisation of the land for tourism and economic exploitation on the other (Suchant, Baritz and Braunisch 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been especially recognized in the planning of very large areas, e.g. for the habitats of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) in the Italian Apennines (Posillico et al 2004) or the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and the chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) in Southwest Germany (Suchant et al 2003). Therefore, the exclusive usage of surrogates is in our opinion only acceptable if there is really no feasible way of determining the actual occurrence of species.…”
Section: Species and Habitat Data Are Both Importantmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As far as animals are concerned, habitat suitability is one of the most frequently used surrogates since many species are habitat-specific. Habitat suitability of sites and hence the likelihood of a species occurring on them are extrapolated using spatial key structures that are simple to survey (Morrison et al 1998;Kliskey et al 1999;Kleyer et al 2000;Suchant et al 2003). Habitat suitability does not depend on whether a species is already present on a certain site and thus provides only indirect information on the ultimately decisive actual presence of the species (direct information) on a site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%