Abstract:Background and Purpose
The potential for therapeutic antibody treatment of neurological diseases is limited by poor penetration across the blood–brain barrier. I.c.v. delivery is a promising route to the brain; however, it is unclear how efficiently antibodies delivered i.c.v. penetrate the cerebrospinal spinal fluid (CSF)‐brain barrier and distribute throughout the brain parenchyma.
Experimental Approach
We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an inhibitory monoclonal antibody against β‐secr… Show more
“…2). The observed 5-10-fold discrepancy is consistent with previous reports of brain antibody concentrations reaching only 0.01-0.02% of steadystate serum concentrations in cynomolgus monkeys [66,67], in contrast with reports of 0.1% in mice [68]. Although it is possible that these interspecies differences in apparent antibody BBB permeability could be due to differences in binding affinity of the antibody Fc region for the neonatal Fc receptor, our results here suggest that more fundamental differences in BBB permeability may exist between species since we used a non-FcRn-binding small molecule probe ( 111 In-DTPA) to measure K p .…”
We previously performed a comparative assessment of tissue-level vascular physiological parameters in mice and rats, two of the most commonly utilized species in translational drug development. The present work extends this effort to non-human primates by measuring tissue-and organ-level vascular volumes (V v), interstitial volumes (V i), and blood flow rates (Q) in cynomolgus monkeys. These measurements were accomplished by red blood cell labeling, extracellular marker infusion, and rubidium chloride bolus distribution, respectively, the same methods used in previous rodent measurements. In addition, whole-body blood volumes (BV) were determined across species. The results demonstrate that V v , V i , and Q, measured using our methods scale approximately by body weight across mouse, rat, and monkey in the tissues considered here, where allometric analysis allowed extrapolation to human parameters. Significant differences were observed between the values determined in this study and those reported in the literature, including V v in muscle, brain, and skin and Q in muscle, adipose, heart, thymus, and spleen. The impact of these differences for selected tissues was evaluated via sensitivity analysis using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. The blood-brain barrier in monkeys was shown to be more impervious to an infused radioactive tracer, indium-111-pentetate, than in mice or rats. The body weight-normalized total BV measured in monkey agreed well with previously measured value in rats but was lower than that in mice. These findings have important implications for the common practice of scaling physiological parameters from rodents to primates in translational pharmacology.
“…2). The observed 5-10-fold discrepancy is consistent with previous reports of brain antibody concentrations reaching only 0.01-0.02% of steadystate serum concentrations in cynomolgus monkeys [66,67], in contrast with reports of 0.1% in mice [68]. Although it is possible that these interspecies differences in apparent antibody BBB permeability could be due to differences in binding affinity of the antibody Fc region for the neonatal Fc receptor, our results here suggest that more fundamental differences in BBB permeability may exist between species since we used a non-FcRn-binding small molecule probe ( 111 In-DTPA) to measure K p .…”
We previously performed a comparative assessment of tissue-level vascular physiological parameters in mice and rats, two of the most commonly utilized species in translational drug development. The present work extends this effort to non-human primates by measuring tissue-and organ-level vascular volumes (V v), interstitial volumes (V i), and blood flow rates (Q) in cynomolgus monkeys. These measurements were accomplished by red blood cell labeling, extracellular marker infusion, and rubidium chloride bolus distribution, respectively, the same methods used in previous rodent measurements. In addition, whole-body blood volumes (BV) were determined across species. The results demonstrate that V v , V i , and Q, measured using our methods scale approximately by body weight across mouse, rat, and monkey in the tissues considered here, where allometric analysis allowed extrapolation to human parameters. Significant differences were observed between the values determined in this study and those reported in the literature, including V v in muscle, brain, and skin and Q in muscle, adipose, heart, thymus, and spleen. The impact of these differences for selected tissues was evaluated via sensitivity analysis using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. The blood-brain barrier in monkeys was shown to be more impervious to an infused radioactive tracer, indium-111-pentetate, than in mice or rats. The body weight-normalized total BV measured in monkey agreed well with previously measured value in rats but was lower than that in mice. These findings have important implications for the common practice of scaling physiological parameters from rodents to primates in translational pharmacology.
“…Thus, continuous 24/7 ICV infusion for 42 days would enable diffusion alone to cover most of the primate brain. • The distribution of the MAb in the brain was detected with immunocytochemistry, which showed the MAb did not penetrate the white matter of the brain (Yadav et al, 2017). However, perivascular flow in the brain occurs in white matter (Hladky and Barrand, 2014).…”
Section: Diffusion As the Primary Mechanism For Drug Penetration Intomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction on the brain/plasma ratio of therapeutic antibodies should be made on the basis of antibody concentrations in brain tissue, not CSF, following IV administration. The concentration of a therapeutic antibody was measured in primate brain tissue after saline clearance of the brain blood volume, and the average brain antibody concentration was 1 nM after an IV infusion of the anti-BACE1 antibody at an ID of 50 mg/kg (Yadav et al, 2017). However, 1 nM is probably an over-estimate of the MAb concentration in brain after IV infusion, and more likely reflects residual MAb still trapped in the plasma volume of the brain.…”
Section: Csf Drug Penetration Is Not An Index Of Drug Transport Acrosmentioning
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and treatment of the brain in aging require the development of new biologic drugs, such as recombinant proteins or gene therapies. Biologics are large molecule therapeutics that do not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). BBB drug delivery is the limiting factor in the future development of new therapeutics for the brain. The delivery of recombinant protein or gene medicines to the brain is a binary process: either the brain drug developer re-engineers the biologic with BBB drug delivery technology, or goes forward with brain drug development in the absence of a BBB delivery platform. The presence of BBB delivery technology allows for engineering the therapeutic to enable entry into the brain across the BBB from blood. Brain drug development may still take place in the absence of BBB delivery technology, but with a reliance on approaches that have rarely led to FDA approval, e.g., CSF injection, stem cells, small molecules, and others. CSF injection of drug is the most widely practiced approach to brain delivery that bypasses the BBB. However, drug injection into the CSF results in limited drug penetration to the brain parenchyma, owing to the rapid export of CSF from the brain to blood. A CSF injection of a drug is equivalent to a slow intravenous (IV) infusion of the pharmaceutical. Given the profound effect the existence of the BBB has on brain drug development, future drug or gene development for the brain will be accelerated by future advances in BBB delivery technology in parallel with new drug discovery.
“…Another important application of bsAbs is to deliver mAbs to areas generally thought to be restricted to antibodies. For example, mAbs exhibit limited distribution to the brain, and mAb concentrations was determined to be 0.1–0.2 % and 0.02 % of the steady‐state circulating mAb concentration in rodents and cynomolgus monkey, respectively . To overcome this limitation, a transferrin receptor (TfR) and β‐secretase 1 (BACE1) bsAbs was generated.…”
Section: Next‐generation Antibody‐based Therapeutics and Their Uniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, mAbs exhibit limited distribution to the brain, and mAb concentrations was determined to be 0.1-0.2 % and 0.02 % of the steady-state circulating mAb concentration in rodents and cynomolgus monkey, respectively. 92,93 To overcome this limitation, a transferrin receptor (TfR) and β-secretase 1 (BACE1) bsAbs was generated. By targeting TfR, a transcytosis efficient membrane protein expressed on endothelial cells in brain, these bsAb constructs drastically improved CNS delivery in both rodents and NHPs.…”
The tutorial introduces the readers to the fundamentals of antibody pharmacokinetics (PK) in the context of drug development. Topics covered include an overview of antibody development, PK characteristics, and the application of antibody PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) in research and development decision‐making. We also discuss the general considerations for planning a nonclinical PK program and describe the types of PK studies that should be performed during early development of monoclonal antibodies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.