2016
DOI: 10.1049/el.2016.2495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wideband compact single‐ridge waveguide to rectangular waveguide transitions with integrated E ‐plane bend

Abstract: Two innovative single-ridge waveguide to rectangular waveguide transitions with integrated 90°E-plane bend are proposed. Since a single-ridge waveguide standard is not available, such components become necessary whenever this technology is employed. Wideband performance, extreme compactness and easy manufacturing are core characteristics. The presented devices operate at Ku band, though the designs are fully scalable to any other frequency band of interest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Power is stimulated through standard WR‐75 waveguide ports: single‐ridge waveguide to WR‐75 waveguide transitions are designed according to …”
Section: Horn‐loaded Slotted Wg 8 × 6 Planar Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. Power is stimulated through standard WR‐75 waveguide ports: single‐ridge waveguide to WR‐75 waveguide transitions are designed according to …”
Section: Horn‐loaded Slotted Wg 8 × 6 Planar Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power is stimulated through standard WR-75 waveguide ports: single-ridge waveguide to WR-75 waveguide transitions are designed according to. 12 6 | HORN-LOADED SLOTTED WG 8 × 24 PLANAR ARRAY Four identical panels are fed with two corporate BFNs, one for each polarization, to build the planar array shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Horn-loaded Slotted Wg 8 × 6 Planar Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stepped transitions consist of ridge or internal contour steps in series, which inherently offer wider bandwidth in a relatively compact size at the expense of complex design and fabrication. 10,11 In Reference 10, a coaxial to WG transition is proposed and shows RL and insertion loss (IL) around 20 dB and 0.22 dB over a 12.2% bandwidth in the back-toback configuration measurement. In Reference 11, a WG to RWG transition is designed and simulated and RL better than 15 dB in a bandwidth of 2.5 GHz is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the introduction of a ridge in the waveguide cross-section reduces the waveguide width for a given cutoff frequency. This practice is quite common in contexts where a small size and a high level of integration are needed, such as dual-polarization antennas [13], transitions [14,15] and beam-forming network components [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%