2011
DOI: 10.1021/jz201325g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Holes and Electrons Separate So Well in Polymer/Fullerene Photovoltaic Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
213
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design rules targeting enhanced exciton and charge diffusion or exciton splitting are, however, hard to come by, since the underlying microscopic mechanisms are not well understood. Efficient exciton dissociation, for example, has been attributed to the assistance of charge separation by a gradient in the free-energy landscape [132,133], structural heterogeneity as a function of distance to the interface [134], doping and charged defects [135], increase in entropy as the electron and hole move away from the interface [136], formation of hot CT states [137], or long-range tunneling [138]. Tuning optical absorption profiles, by contrast, is a more manageable approach to enhance the external quantum efficiency of single-junction devices.…”
Section: The Acceptor-donor-acceptor Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Design rules targeting enhanced exciton and charge diffusion or exciton splitting are, however, hard to come by, since the underlying microscopic mechanisms are not well understood. Efficient exciton dissociation, for example, has been attributed to the assistance of charge separation by a gradient in the free-energy landscape [132,133], structural heterogeneity as a function of distance to the interface [134], doping and charged defects [135], increase in entropy as the electron and hole move away from the interface [136], formation of hot CT states [137], or long-range tunneling [138]. Tuning optical absorption profiles, by contrast, is a more manageable approach to enhance the external quantum efficiency of single-junction devices.…”
Section: The Acceptor-donor-acceptor Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathways for charge separation as a microscopically poorly understood process [134,136,138,161,[186][187][188][189] are therefore still actively investigated: As a key result of this chapter, we will show how the energy landscape that emerges from mesoscale order provides pushout forces that can drive the charge separation process -in line with the apparent absence of a Coulomb barrier claimed for some systems [187]. In deriving the functional difference with a small photovoltaic gap Γ versus the (b) face-on orientation with large Γ. Gas-phase ionization energies and electron affinities are denoted as IE 0 and EA 0 , respectively.…”
Section: Pathway For Charge Splitting and Detrappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 A mechanistic understanding of the charge generation process has been pursued for several years in order to explain these apparent discrepancies. Current opinion can be roughly divided between researchers who emphasize the role of energetic and morphological inhomogeneities [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and those emphasizing kinetic processes. 22- 34 Guo and Inganas provide a concise review of many the leading viewpoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Troisi and coworkers pointed out that because of the 938 lower band gap of chain segments within the crystallites, these excitons are repelled 939 by the more disordered donor-acceptor interface [179]. The authors therefore 940 proposed that these excitons split via tunneling of the electron through layers of 941 more distorted polymer chains at the interface into higher and partially delocalized 942 states on the PCBM aggregates (see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exciton split-up can, however, occur via electron tunneling into partially delocalized states in the PCBM aggregates. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [179]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%