1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199805)35:5<547::aid-tea5>3.0.co;2-p
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Why does it go up? The impact of the MARS curriculum as revealed through changes in student explanations of a helium balloon
Abstract: The Model-Assisted Reasoning in Science (MARS) project created a model-centered, computer-supported sixth-grade science curriculum organized around the theme balance of forces. To help monitor effectiveness during implementation in a public middle school, individual student interviews were conducted after each of the curriculum's three sections. In each interview, students were asked to explain why a helium balloon floats up. This article describes an analysis of student responses to the balloon question and w…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
34
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
4
0
2
Year Published
2000
2025
Publication Types
Select...
30
3
2
Relationship
0
35
Authors
Journals
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 24 publications
0
4
0
2
“…The MARS project (Raghaven & Glaser, 1995;Raghaven, Sartoris & Glaser, 1998a, 1998b set out to develop model-building skills in grade 6 students in USA. Working on fundamental topics, e.g., 'mass,' 'force,' students did practical work, made predictions, inserted these predictions into a model constructed on a computer, 'ran' the model so produced to see how the outcomes compared with those produced by the consensus model.…”
Section: Learning To Construct Models De Novomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The MARS project (Raghaven & Glaser, 1995;Raghaven, Sartoris & Glaser, 1998a, 1998b set out to develop model-building skills in grade 6 students in USA. Working on fundamental topics, e.g., 'mass,' 'force,' students did practical work, made predictions, inserted these predictions into a model constructed on a computer, 'ran' the model so produced to see how the outcomes compared with those produced by the consensus model.…”
Section: Learning To Construct Models De Novomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, only a few interventions for floating sinking phenomena also address these scientific practices. Of the studies which did so, some adopted explicit instruction of the scientific practices' reasoning (e.g., Efstathiou et al, 2018; Grotzer, 2003; Raghavan et al, 1998; Shen et al, 2017; Zoupidis et al, 2016), while others embedded activities that implicitly guided students in using and understanding those practices (e.g., Campbell et al, 2011; Edelsbrunner et al, 2018; Hashweh, 2016; Herrenkohl et al, 1999; van Riesen et al, 2019).…”
Section: What Is Known About Teaching and Learning Floating And Sinking?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, computer-based activities and modeling in this way facilitate the understanding of theories and concepts by processing complex data. In this way, the scientific process becomes more active and complex facts are understood (Metcalf et al, 2000;Raghavan et al, 1998;Raghavan et al, 1995;Stratford, 1997;White, 1993).…”
Section: Modeling Activities Arementioning
confidence: 99%
