Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1014052.1014125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why collective inference improves relational classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
197
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
197
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relational learning addresses the relational representation (first order logic) that relational learning has seen many applications such as relational classification [21], link based clustering of web search [22], and link prediction in relational data [23].…”
Section: Statistical Relational Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relational learning addresses the relational representation (first order logic) that relational learning has seen many applications such as relational classification [21], link based clustering of web search [22], and link prediction in relational data [23].…”
Section: Statistical Relational Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-network classification, for which training entities are connected directly to entities whose labels are to be classified, stays in contrast to across-network classification, where models learnt from one network are applied to another similar network [4]. Across-network classification can be understood as a transfer learning approach that accomplishes relational classification [5].…”
Section: Relational Influence Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing complexity and structure of data on the Web revealed limitations of the traditional attribute based (content) classi cation based solely on own content of data objects. In search for advanced methods capable to exploit structure of interconnected data instances more intensively, single relational classi cation [7,5] originated as more e cient alternative to content classi cation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%