2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who tells the truth? Former inmates' self-reported arrests vs. official records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The disaggregated measures tap into secondary research questions on the differential relationships of aspects of PPTS on risk and offending. Although there may be concerns about individuals with higher PPTs potentially misreporting self-reported offending, PPTs were not a significant predictor of the discordance between self-reported arrest and official records in a sample of formerly incarcerated adults (Daylor et al, 2019). The PCL was used in the current study instead of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory scale (YPI; Andershed et al, 2002) as the YPI was measured in follow-up waves (i.e., T2–T11) which presents temporal order concerns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The disaggregated measures tap into secondary research questions on the differential relationships of aspects of PPTS on risk and offending. Although there may be concerns about individuals with higher PPTs potentially misreporting self-reported offending, PPTs were not a significant predictor of the discordance between self-reported arrest and official records in a sample of formerly incarcerated adults (Daylor et al, 2019). The PCL was used in the current study instead of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory scale (YPI; Andershed et al, 2002) as the YPI was measured in follow-up waves (i.e., T2–T11) which presents temporal order concerns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…9 The potential drawbacks of our data provide several opportunities for future research in this area. Although the use of offender self-reports in the criminological literature are widespread and have been shown to be accurate (Daylor et al, 2019;Johnson et al, 2005), there may be lingering concerns that veterans, whether due to shame, social desirability bias, or the amount of time passed, would underreport their resistance at arrest. Within our study, we attempted to mitigate recall concerns by controlling for the number of years spent in prison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies comparing official records and selfreports of offending (mainly arrests) show medium to high agreement between the two methods (e.g., Krohn et al 2013;Piquero et al 2014), although indicating a higher frequency with self-reports of offending (e.g., Maxfield et al 2000;Auty et al 2015). Official records' databases may be incomplete, and this may overestimate the true amount of overreporting (Daylor et al 2019). On a slightly different note, Clark and Tifft (1966) interviewed students with and without a polygraph in order to study the validity of self-reported deviant behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%